IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 28 May 2014 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324201A0346 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 22:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOnAWMyd3wsJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 22:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 348D71A0330 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 22:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.6] (unknown [99.146.30.218]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F35422B1D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 05:41:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1401255681; bh=cg0HgF4WFTzS6GTJJbWbRxR4GhxXXVnw71eym/kE+7Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=nOlMkc6X+tulf4WrGjaujjOPge7gdXtedpD+wUi2cdg9Ta5+lSiV3nFcPQKt20JOh ODHJb4HgCBVS8qbXdEsInebKOfDm/i6CveD3Ge9km6E5ZVVx1dNf277v3qhOZG9JhZ 7H2Up/HwYpN93+jV8DKhAFmuk1vKHJz8sQz6P4xk=
Message-ID: <538576FB.2030805@dougbarton.us>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 22:41:15 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m261ks7xww.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840070.90801@gmail.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48D335AAB3D@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com>
In-Reply-To: <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48D335AAB3D@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.7a1pre
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/WYDGEMw1Tc4Gl0UwbLpb7mwOC0A
Subject: Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 05:41:25 -0000

On 05/27/2014 06:35 AM, Wuyts Carl wrote:
> And what's next ?  Stop path MTU discovery support ?  Allow Fragmentation again ?  Anything else ?
> If we start mimic IPv4 fully, we're really going the wrong way ....

Argumentum ad absurdum

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email