IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fragments [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Wed, 28 May 2014 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F211A09A8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p8M71jIQlXqr for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1111A0153 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4SEakdO019445; Wed, 28 May 2014 15:36:46 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk s4SEakdO019445
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1401287806; bh=NpXOaCRbVDgvsLL7fa2ayNw5BEE=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Sm61OB4/ub52PfKXBcpD4KYwHlm0n//snGF2a+yrVhOgt4vVZKt/Afmg8SLcjuduz eGODmAefSI9vBoI1t2Rwa0i84pmDszThb/1Rop1US5foOlB5UhZS2nd1uzTQHNsvlj Fn7GiWdAtXV/D02CLD5+D6faV0sNCYNQFU9jD+QU=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id q4RFak05460236832A ret-id none; Wed, 28 May 2014 15:36:46 +0100
Received: from dhcp-207-135.wireless.soton.ac.uk (dhcp-207-135.wireless.soton.ac.uk [152.78.207.135] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4SEakbG026540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 May 2014 15:36:46 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <m1Wpel8-0000BZC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:36:47 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|b0e1ff0485d786fb04ada63ec6ebead4q4RFak03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|415376E7-9A8F-46CB-ABEA-FD86102DFACF@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m261ks7xww.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840070.90801@gmail.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48D335AAB3D@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <20140527222313.7B12716B8D59@rock.dv.isc.org> <53851236.8020209@bogus.com> <5385522F.40305@gmail.com> <4BA71D7E-7A38-4327-8C7D-7E49F047CDDB@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|51fc5e85b5e6c2650a1f63c2b27fdf6fq4RARx03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4BA71D7E-7A38-4327-8C7D-7E49F047CDDB@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181B2B5F33@XCH-BLV-! 504.nw.no s.boeing.com> <m1Wpel8-0000BZC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <415376E7-9A8F-46CB-ABEA-FD86102DFACF@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
X-smtpf-Report: sid=q4RFak054602368300; tid=q4RFak05460236832A; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=2:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: s4SEakdO019445
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/3HeOGxUWTRRKYSPC8IJVpGg0y4M
Cc: v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fragments [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 14:37:04 -0000

Hi,

On 28 May 2014, at 15:23, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:

> In your letter dated Wed, 28 May 2014 14:15:48 +0000 you wrote:
>>> Tests that Fernando and I reported at the last IEPG show around 50% of the Alexa top 
>> 1m sites which
>>> support IPv6 also drop frags.  Tests for other types of EH are far from encouraging t
>> oo.
>> 
>> Then, how are we ever going to support tunnels over IPv6?
> 
> Measurements using RIPE Atlas suggest that most filtering is done near the edges.
> So if you want a tunnel, make sure that your site and the remote site don't do that
> kind of filtering.
> 
> In addition, fragmentation involving DNS seems to work way better than sending
> fragmented packets to the Alexa top 1m sites. So the kind of filtering you encounter
> may also depend on where you look.

Do you have a pointer to these results?

Thanks,
Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email