IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 30 May 2014 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4641A08FB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFyanjm6nbn7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9D81A08F6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.dyn.netability.ie (089-101-195154.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.154] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4UEbLMI070736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 30 May 2014 15:37:22 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host 089-101-195154.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.154] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.dyn.netability.ie
Message-ID: <538897A1.20909@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:37:21 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m261ks7xww.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840070.90801@gmail.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <m2iooq4oqi.wl%randy@psg.com> <5385762E.5020901@dougbarton.us> <5385AA97.1050207@fud.no> <53864DCB.5070202@gmail.com> <53865EA2.9000502@fud.no> <02dc01cf7c06$cc6a4bc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <53888B90.4030509@foobar.org> <CAD6AjGRQ8+yC1iHY3noV4jcMPYTS_UjQx-E8XOiT=sXu1XxY6A@mail.gmail.com> <5388911B.6020007@foobar.org> <53889209.7010402@foobar.org> <6CA5BF96-1E76-4BD4-A413-84EC7AFC0E1C@istaf! f.org>
In-Reply-To: <6CA5BF96-1E76-4BD4-A413-84EC7AFC0E1C@istaff.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Jidu6xjIxM_hHf0nCXTVhQJUN_g
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:37:32 -0000

On 30/05/2014 15:21, John Curran wrote:
> On May 30, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 30/05/2014 15:09, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>>> e.g. asr9000 typhoon cards. 
>>
>> correction: typhoon cards have 4M FIB "credits".  ipv4 entries take one
>> credit; ipv6 take two.  So assuming no ipv4, a typhoon card will handle 2m
>> ipv6 FIB entries.
> 
> Acceptable end state does not imply viable intermediate states.

itym, "acceptable intermediate states do not imply viable end state".

We can all agree to that, but we have 60x overhead on current generation
technology and linear growth.  There are more pressing problems than this.
 Let's deal with them instead.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email