IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 24 June 2014 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B204A1B2903 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHKgxbuvUuUI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935DC1B2A26 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org ([IPv6:2001:4d68:2002:100::110]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5OL1VBE092164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:01:32 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host [IPv6:2001:4d68:2002:100::110] claimed to be cupcake.foobar.org
Message-ID: <53A9E72B.7030502@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:01:31 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
References: <20140602013829.875B917236AC@rock.dv.isc.org> <53A843C9.1040002@gmail.com> <70F894D7-8701-420F-B16F-F8EAF3AE276F@nominum.com> <53A94E88.6070101@foobar.org> <8E5FC7CC-454E-437F-A85B-69366BC5D7B5@nominum.com> <53A989D8.2080704@foobar.org> <BA6D229B-0645-42CB-BC29-DB467EB697A7@nominum.com> <53A9C84A.8020304@foobar.org> <20140624194638.GZ46558@Space.Net> <53A9D643.6040100@foobar.org> <20140624195720.GA46558@Space.Net> <53A9E2F3.6080206@foobar.org> <21C61EF9-A82A-4493-9597-DCC62DE37F78@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <21C61EF9-A82A-4493-9597-DCC62DE37F78@nominum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/f6a8Q9wIiRiz-WhD5Q0YiN1C-Us
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:11:30 -0000

On 24/06/2014 21:51, Ted Lemon wrote:
> I shut up about this because as far as I can tell, the question of multihoming has no bearing on this discussion.   That is, I'm fairly sure that even if I explained what I meant by multihoming, it would still not lead us anywhere useful.

you're right, it's off-topic.  Let's kill this ratholing exercise.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email