IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 29 May 2014 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E2B1A07C8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PoWkim3HTkRz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB65E1A0729 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id kq14so12046581pab.24 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dzl0Yzc5qU4yywk3pQy9KPg1j8gLvxAv7ZEz/0NR/Lg=; b=OntyOHk/iBHwRkh4Z7dKLA73IeOUCu5cEX+J8VTL8619CUY55QEDozjxfuUaX05pGH Rf2LiC7bOgKvWiRF1GxIY3v/rodfAe7nOoieOeG6v75Z3V21FAPdzs/cwwkRKc+d+udD Ae7SL+jg3PxZiVvCuNW+0Biho9FhOJVNmuGrkCl7TPt0yzOHt994MP3LJ/lA97RdlEBi E4ewwn6YQ5kwIB40BwvBnMYQtb9eCEzXleJGSY4ta9HzemRm+HJuol2s29Qeca3Oum3U i1mg0qJN0FykEj/ynr8soluvbEEKuzUPFwNu0aDDvjUfPN7HyegQ1oTNPP3KjCrDKMFx 7pZA==
X-Received: by 10.68.99.194 with SMTP id es2mr5124807pbb.100.1401334427071; Wed, 28 May 2014 20:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (209.199.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.199.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vn13sm21519606pab.8.2014.05.28.20.33.44 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 May 2014 20:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5386AA9F.7000001@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:33:51 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m261ks7xww.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840070.90801@gmail.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <m1WpHrp-0000BQC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <9DB71B37-999E-4F7F-A7DA-6B243574E818@nominum.com> <2E2EC822-60EB-4B09-8BB3-D8FB098EB181@delong.com> <CD77B261-5F6F-4177-AA50-0B2DD3D15260@nominum.com> <B95BEA59-B1A2-4CEF-ACF4-63F65FB544AA@delong.com> <4FF6E348-6BB5-473A-8E94-4A3EE8BD32DC@nominum.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405280707260.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0ED911FA-D24C-4FC8-9D6A-F38F9711F115@steffann.nl> <m2fvjt1m0l.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2fvjt1m0l.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/t6k_XO4u-DBGM0agJcAJICmEQRU
Cc: v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 03:33:53 -0000

On 29/05/2014 12:11, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> We should spend more time on getting renumbering working
>>> properly. Having all Enterprise get PI space will make the routing
>>> system melt down.
>> Either that, or coming up with a routing protocol that can handle the
>> number of prefixes..
> 
> red herring.  global prefixes designed to be used in place of ula should
> not be in the global routing table

Indeed they shouldn't, but since everybody should be filtering ULAs
(and most people will do so), ULAs won't propagate but routeable GUAs
might.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email