IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com> Sun, 01 June 2014 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621551A007B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvytfdVy-Gxp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:888:1044:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E081A008C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #91) id m1WrCJ2-0000DVC; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 22:24:36 +0200
Message-Id: <m1WrCJ2-0000DVC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <m2iooq4oqi.wl%randy@psg.com> <5385762E.5020901@dougbarton.us> <5385AA97.1050207@fud.no> <53864DCB.5070202@gmail.com> <53865EA2.9000502@fud.no> <02dc01cf7c06$cc6a4bc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <97390E9C-460F-4D08-AFCE-E4A991E2B0E4@cisco.com> <46D22F62-3528-4B9D-9FCF-C9C7466A9ABA@delong.com> <20140531104145.GQ46558@Space.Net> <m1WqqZ4-0000DqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20140531214908.10FEE1719BB4@rock.dv.isc.org> <m1WqrFK-0000BHC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <23125E9D-85A1-49EB-ACE6-DB5EAC67EE02@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr0pvet1oOip-Y2Xi_h2mSZfW1R5HtfiAGbDEns0dY-d2A@mail.gmail.com> <2A4B72CD-EDF3-4D11-AC39-B65892F9173F@nominum.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:10:18 -0400 ." <2A4B72CD-EDF3-4D11-AC39-B65892F9173F@nominum.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:24:36 +0200
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/itxS8TJRNvgxJeOBMEYkDa5B2S8
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 20:24:45 -0000

In your letter dated Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:10:18 -0400 you wrote:
>On Jun 1, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
>> Because...?
>
>Because any situation where you are multi-homed, if either home fails 
>and your software can't try both to see which one is working, there's a 
>good chance it will fail to connect.

Nice how this thread evolves:
- Use PI space, it works (but is not really scalable)
- No, no, get with the program. Get multi-homed on PA.
- We don't actually have anything for servers and multi-homed PA.
- Every piece of software has to do HE because of how multi-homed PA fails.

Great way of advertising IPv6.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email