IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Routing /48s [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 28 May 2014 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAB21A0341 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 21:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CzF5l7qXR-gK for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 21:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F291A032F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 21:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747413493B4; Wed, 28 May 2014 04:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E3D16005B; Wed, 28 May 2014 04:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A6C6160049; Wed, 28 May 2014 04:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441F616BFEB4; Wed, 28 May 2014 14:39:10 +1000 (EST)
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m261ks7xww.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840070.90801@gmail.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <m1WpHrp-0000BQC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <9DB71B37-999E-4F7F-A7DA-6B243574E818@nominum.com> <2E2EC822-60EB-4B09-8BB3-D8FB098EB181@delong.com> <CD77B261-5F6F-4177-AA50-0B2DD3D15260@nominum.com> <B95BEA59-B1A2-4CEF-ACF4-63F65FB544AA@delong.com> <4FF6E348-6BB5-473A-8E94-4A3EE8BD32DC@nominum.com> <53855130.8040105@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0JP=RCBJ5Pn=wRHLJodyA2w1+a+XqaiJ-Wf9-oNE0acA@mail.gmail.com> <53856628.2070201@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 May 2014 16:29:28 +1200." <53856628.2070201@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 14:39:10 +1000
Message-Id: <20140528043910.441F616BFEB4@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7X_EbVsSGXXdZTACqoq8ytmBZ0M
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>, v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Routing /48s [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 04:39:19 -0000

In message <53856628.2070201@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter writes:
> On 28/05/2014 15:12, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
> > brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Let's assume a paltry 5 billion homenets, each with a routed /48.
> >>
> >> Well, today BGP-4 has 17687 entries for IPv6, according to
> >> http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/index.html
> >> It will be interesting when that number changes to 5000000000.
> >>
> >> Somehow I doubt this will happen. Quite how far we go in that
> >> direction is an interesting question.
> >>
> > 
> > You don't need ULA to solve this. homenet is solving this problem using
> > source+destination routing.
> 
> Indeed, and not just homenet. I just wanted to remind people that prefix-per-site
> has a scaling issue. That's why I changed the Subject:.
> 
> On the other hand, and I speak from experience, persuading IT departments
> to support SADR is harder than persuading them to allow multiple prefixes.

Given SADR normally implies multiple prefixes it stands to reason.

>     Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email