Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks

[[e-mail]]

> > or use NAT.  I'm not saying this in order to throw fuel on an existing
> > fire, but simply because this is the reality for many organisations in
> > the ipv4 world, and I see little reason why it will change for ipv6.
> > The IETF can make recommendations about whether it thinks this is a
> > good idea or not, but it is not productive to pretend that the
> > elephant isn't in the room.
> 
> so, bottom line here is, in its inimitable fashion, the ietf will push
> ULA and get NAT.  what a win!

IPv6 will get NAT no matter what the IETF does. Trying to reduce the
damage from NAT, for instance by having sensible rules for ULA, seems
like a good thing.

Steinar Haug, AS2116