IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 29 May 2014 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137921A0770 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjV-K30xb0gv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A90A71A02FC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fa1so12170327pad.39 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MrMNGFNO0Z1OAliQtSmcb+ZtmIQ+1C2h6b/NPLLLrcM=; b=yv1k+T9l0u5qZBwydUWLQzGwzUwsjOMO90Nlq3w15oj6Luzk6rlGW2qEykNCQBNCjO JN3Ll6zek4KLbBKt0NOVTlkkH2LO9UXCjGwGXXLoGBxHhBZDoRuMaep3mfZmhGdY2lDY J44ZDRN5P09VoQx8eeyx9CTGvjtRZIgfvS8CeklZ436s2rL8FFydug8uGGeOi8vZXv3u 0n+q5gOb36oJ55LlTBFs9LPxw1Ow1ConL4b4pi1nIPzwpJh34fCQz9PWhZKuxf1YPDru A57yTKjRoq4yIOmLKHmoCwReULNHXPqYpS1HuC5xRUW+5RgcaDCpGeH3zmesZbvTqEzC xbmg==
X-Received: by 10.68.131.227 with SMTP id op3mr4981578pbb.87.1401336026966; Wed, 28 May 2014 21:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (209.199.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.199.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rx10sm97634718pab.48.2014.05.28.21.00.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 May 2014 21:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5386B0DF.9060401@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 16:00:31 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <m1WpHrp-0000BQC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <9DB71B37-999E-4F7F-A7DA-6B243574E818@nominum.com> <2E2EC822-60EB-4B09-8BB3-D8FB098EB181@delong.com> <CD77B261-5F6F-4177-AA50-0B2DD3D15260@nominum.com> <B95BEA59-B1A2-4CEF-ACF4-63F65FB544AA@delong.com> <4FF6E348-6BB5-473A-8E94-4A3EE8BD32DC@nominum.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405280707260.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0ED911FA-D24C-4FC8-9D6A-F38F9711F115@steffann.nl> <m2fvjt1m0l.wl%randy@psg.com> <5386AA9F.7000001@gmail.com> <m2sintz1tq.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2sintz1tq.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/wZzUHk1FVEhSjEkyN62Ij8oAJJE
Cc: v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 04:00:32 -0000

On 29/05/2014 15:44, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> red herring.  global prefixes designed to be used in place of ula should
>>> not be in the global routing table
>> Indeed they shouldn't, but since everybody should be filtering ULAs
>> (and most people will do so), ULAs won't propagate but routeable GUAs
>> might.
> 
> explain why the two probability distributions will differ

Because I have considerable confidence that the majority of transit
operators will know they need to filter fc00::/7, but the same cannot
be said of arbitrary /48s from RIR space.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email