IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 27 May 2014 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39311A0163 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 00:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mb4nkAmnol15 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 00:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 237131A0273 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 00:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id E6A6BA1; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:05:03 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1401174303; bh=Jp6cCepeQKWEUDT+jAqprgOXdcKCmzLqIHTeFArBYNE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rWTVxXXP2LrWwZ3LNMpMwgxlgeNlifjOL6S2FUW8q4SVHppPR7gghYDIbTz8A1ULQ NEdChphvJgGneFpVj1i0nhvYFYIKyyKno2k9todpQZhcQOSM2T0ixZ309B2lcjIz1h LP7uWkrNURBIUrFF5GBp2mxiXrmG/JfvgMnVvA/8=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DF49C; Tue, 27 May 2014 09:05:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 09:05:03 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140527065441.3E98316B6F9D@rock.dv.isc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405270901500.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m261ks7xww.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840070.90801@gmail.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <20140527060418.0157A16B6C6E@rock.dv.isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405270846491.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20140527065441.3E98316B6F9D@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/uJIYW4Md7FPJj09-0qXQOp0O3WU
Cc: v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:05:10 -0000

On Tue, 27 May 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:

> You need split horizon if you use ULA regardless of whether you connect 
> to another ULA site or not.  ULA + GUA requires split horizon.

Well, if that's the methodology then you now have 3 prefixes so it's an 
additional split horizon to maintain.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email