IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 01 June 2014 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E811A027A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RmUJzaETTAVB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01F91A0086 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbp.local (c-67-188-0-113.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.0.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s51KWsZk084013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 20:32:54 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <538B6AC3.7020402@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 11:02:43 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/30.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>
References: <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <m2iooq4oqi.wl%randy@psg.com> <5385762E.5020901@dougbarton.us> <5385AA97.1050207@fud.no> <53864DCB.5070202@gmail.com> <53865EA2.9000502@fud.no> <02dc01cf7c06$cc6a4bc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <97390E9C-460F-4D08-AFCE-E4A991E2B0E4@cisco.com> <46D22F62-3528-4B9D-9FCF-C9C7466A9ABA@delong.com> <20140531104145.GQ46558@Space.Net> <m1WqqZ4-0000DqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20140531214908.10FEE1719BB4@rock.dv.isc.org> <m1WqrFK-0000BHC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <23125E9D-85A1-49EB-ACE6-DB5EAC67EE02@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <23125E9D-85A1-49EB-ACE6-DB5EAC67EE02@nominum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QLpoCVPQSm0raINdWf2rkKuoGxlk7Enwi"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 01 Jun 2014 20:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_rA4bYfdoH_OL0L5D0nJQqkJlJU
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 20:33:02 -0000

On 6/1/14, 9:54 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On May 31, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Philip Homburg
> <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
>> You suggest that every possible piece of software should implement
>> HE?
> 
> Software that doesn't implement some kind of happy eyeballs mechanism
> is going to work poorly on an IPv6 internet.   Ask rather whether
> there could be some support for HE-like behavior that is relatively
> easy for app developers to use, so that they don't fail to use it and
> wind up making applications with crappy behaviors during partial
> outages.

Assumption of the Existence of HE  is a pretty dodgy proposition. if
you're an application and you support it great. but v6-only connected
hosts even with 4 translation probably don't bother or even know to try
for example.


> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email