Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks

[Gert Doering <[e-mail]>]

hi,

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:08:16AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> We should spend more time on getting renumbering working properly. Having 
> all Enterprise get PI space will make the routing system melt down.

I think this one boils down to "what is 'an Enterprise'" and, subsequently,
"how many of those are there".

One side of the discussion seems to include barbershops etc. ("SME") in
this group - and there are way too many of them, but renumbering those
networks is usually trivial ("what is my printer's IP address?" is nicely
answered by mDNS, so no need to hard-code IPv6 addresses anywhere where
you'd have to renumber them alter on... etc.).

The truly big ones are not candidates for renumbering, but we're talking
about significantly smaller numbers here :-)  (and, interestingly enough,
many of them don't *want* Internet in the first place, they want an internal
network, a proxy server, and that one can easily renumber if needed...)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: [phone]           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279