IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 28 May 2014 05:08 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB45A1A033A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 22:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tgF6Qnts8dJb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2014 22:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5431A032B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 May 2014 22:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id C4A2E9C; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:08:16 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1401253696; bh=OY+1xOdq2ZJPim8+5H8x5cbkjDpBTAnNiTuZqDPTk28=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CmvJV1TENfGFAQ5Qvjms7q3R5SFvep5cmtwxqBa7nNp0ooDQCof/WM1SaCJuugq5w 7w1CZ9Mhm6PxeGd9hzRuBzcvJqAS+hjg8i6ViCns3uBcmOheuRCg8trCXeXL+IU6qt CI0FiVzGJhjlBt75ElI1D/SgczB2e1FYG+tUwqXM=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B866E9A; Wed, 28 May 2014 07:08:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 07:08:16 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FF6E348-6BB5-473A-8E94-4A3EE8BD32DC@nominum.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405280707260.29282@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m261ks7xww.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840070.90801@gmail.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <m1WpHrp-0000BQC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <9DB71B37-999E-4F7F-A7DA-6B243574E818@nominum.com> <2E2EC822-60EB-4B09-8BB3-D8FB098EB181@delong.com> <CD77B261-5F6F-4177-AA50-0B2DD3D15260@nominum.com> <B95BEA59-B1A2-4CEF-ACF4-63F65FB544AA@delong.com> <4FF6E348-6BB5-473A-8E94-4A3EE8BD32DC@nominum.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/tBfZV-v0RIR76rOfnCv4jercz9A
Cc: v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 05:08:23 -0000

On Tue, 27 May 2014, Ted Lemon wrote:

> I'm just a poor bastard with a home connection that now (thanks, 
> Comcast!) has native IPv6.  If you tell me that every enterprise on the 
> planet can easily get a /48 routed at no cost, then indeed that's 
> probably the right way to go.  I will defer to others with more 
> experience in these matters to tell me whether or not that is so; my 
> understanding hitherto has been that it is not.

We should spend more time on getting renumbering working properly. Having 
all Enterprise get PI space will make the routing system melt down.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email