Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Sat, 31 May 2014 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD241A08E2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 May 2014 03:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8J4mr-bW2Zqd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 May 2014 03:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E66D31A0884 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2014 03:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62028604B0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2014 12:36:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31BB3602AA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2014 12:36:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 946 invoked by uid 1007); 31 May 2014 12:36:30 +0200
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 12:36:30 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Message-ID: <20140531103630.GP46558@Space.Net>
References: <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <m2iooq4oqi.wl%randy@psg.com> <5385762E.5020901@dougbarton.us> <5385AA97.1050207@fud.no> <53864DCB.5070202@gmail.com> <53865EA2.9000502@fud.no> <02dc01cf7c06$cc6a4bc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <3350A387-4F86-4445-A72E-075913E40618@delong.com> <5388E963.50809@gmail.com> <7E749954-A7A8-4A86-B7EE-E5F649D568EB@delong.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7E749954-A7A8-4A86-B7EE-E5F649D568EB@delong.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/p44337k-1hHcAOgu9OhG7JeM9gs
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 10:36:40 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:45:20PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I think we could, actually, learn a little from the phone system here. 

Yep.  I really like the flexibility of the number porting system in the
telephone world.  Like, you only have to tell them a few weeks in advance,
you can't have multihoming of the same phone number to different carriers
(unless you are a carrier yourself and get to sign the *large* stack of
paper first), and foremost, for international calls everything usually 
still goes through the Incumbent.

Indeed, there is lots to learn there why not to go there.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279