IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Routing /48s [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 28 May 2014 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C5A1A024B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ch-yyRsLEAtM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x230.google.com (mail-pb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9838C1A0246 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id rr13so11714842pbb.7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qxQBX9axxzPMXMVjSXPwxPtqbPf9CODOU9Br6Wg83yA=; b=TTg/01MQRboAc7QMvqCD4xNnFgfHSsIVyv40VFPChqs8QZBYWrfQVKZRvNmAj/7WvX 8dix3XQ8azvCQcHSZWj7WKtut7Y5A58Xysp8CES291GWfek0zF1P5ar2VZTiorLlEIwp 3/eU5x+nCeypnduXvCDDqy33tpj0E6upy51gzBr6yVBV33Yj74GjK987QOOjKfkkVyWX HgVr4Dnfu0/wTYihewmZbH/15QE4bostkiDGbCDWBkYXkURia7T2yjgap9N11kY1IOhr qsBiOo0A5DW0PH6gZb6uHm3aug1bpIa9/sg9FEK8npF+G3rbHT+LywLYRyAlZ/cL4FAl 0YJA==
X-Received: by 10.68.237.33 with SMTP id uz1mr2815798pbc.76.1401309601104; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (209.199.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.199.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yv7sm93405937pac.33.2014.05.28.13.39.58 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 May 2014 13:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <538649A4.6010103@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 08:40:04 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
References: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6B9A@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2y4xn7wep.wl%randy@psg.com> <53840723.8010606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1O_poMR200sjU=ttRvGaeQRkC1ZfXC0Ok4uQxdq3K=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2mwe37tbn.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr2t3-vxuG=iDi4biBNFpJwuzuHgfpB74i_uydWWRV7qZg@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D8B6E02@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2fvjv7q4h.wl%randy@psg.com> <m1WpDcc-0000BMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <m1WpHrp-0000BQC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <9DB71B37-999E-4F7F-A7DA-6B243574E818@nominum.com> <2E2EC822-60EB-4B09-8BB3-D8FB098EB181@delong.com> <CD77B261-5F6F-4177-AA50-0B2DD3D15260@nominum.com> <B95BEA59-B1A2-4CEF-ACF4-63F65FB544AA@delong.com> <4FF6E348-6BB5-473A-8E94-4A3EE8BD32DC@nominum.com> <53855130.8040105@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0JP=RCBJ5Pn=wRHLJodyA2w1+a+XqaiJ-Wf9-oNE0acA@mail.gmail.com> <53856628.2070201@gmail.com> <4042F444-2A43-499C-823E-52BCDEF112CE@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4042F444-2A43-499C-823E-52BCDEF112CE@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/cJKMDKMMchNUfK1eeA3wAQuku8g
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>, v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Routing /48s [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 20:40:05 -0000

On 29/05/2014 00:21, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On May 28, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On the other hand, and I speak from experience, persuading IT departments
>> to support SADR is harder than persuading them to allow multiple prefixes.
> 
> Do we have implementations we could in theory try to persuade them to run?

I was referring to SADR in a site border router that leads to two
different ISPs. That, I understand, is readily available but requires
extra config and extra cycles.

SADR for a host to select the next hop indeed needs new stuff, afaik.

     Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email