Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

[Philip Homburg <[e-mail]>]

In your letter dated Sat, 31 May 2014 12:41:45 +0200 you wrote:
>PA with automatic network (re-)numbering and multihoming with multiple
>PA networks already works today, and will really work much more pleasantly
>than PI *for those networks* as soon as we've sorted out some of the 
>remaining kinks (like source-address selection with SA failover).
>
>Maybe you should step down from your "I have PI, I like it, everybody must
>have PI" soapbox and actually look at what, for example, homenet has 
>achieved in the last years.  This stuff looks complicated (and under the
>hood, it is), but the end user experience "take this box, plug in a number
>of ISPs, things work, no further configuration is needed(*)" is nothing you
>can match with a PI network.

I can see how you can do do multiple PA prefixes client side. Done that
for years now. Even with different routers providing the upstreams. No problem
there.

But I have nothing to update my DNS zones. How do I reflect which links 
are up or down? Is there even a draft for that? What's the BCP for TTL
values, DNSSEC, etc?