IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 02 June 2014 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81761A0109 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 18:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnWAiLXeHbrU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 18:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C151A0107 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 18:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id lx4so3885786iec.19 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5+lJx3zpYcFtXTm91Xvul2kCjOm1Ng6/HJ8Rrh75JfQ=; b=CBErIB/SO1OSSxJZwx1pnG1ijvy/ytZxMY7FsiYHLglANhgni/dGEZ5rcCsSCMtHP0 tnG3nasXEWuIpRGxxJauEzAkI6ldsfPylae2VZCZzc4bN/aKTnzXyrc6jNKxchQI+NaP P2segkU9cFzcc71kX12HTCbC72ONRdFzV/BT0BaBfAsIdYdoXFMFad2AgHWTWaA3zGsL YnUpAgNwW9p0jv7kUlYuHCGV0CDSfBpeeaXMEAA8go+sYArQgkXwZi+wg07rlW8PgDY/ RpZwneecn8hoj0o7gFqmmSs9tiTbfZNBUxotXlpGgJJ9Yl4xCb6+xk6a/PXGbpi6O+bd t71Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5+lJx3zpYcFtXTm91Xvul2kCjOm1Ng6/HJ8Rrh75JfQ=; b=OdqEwYR80UiehvyAJyOgeA12M7QCvhwe3mpXFUd0DHtutKOk9eVXf0PeFehkyTgmCA ElMD/VazfcHHYDDx3a5/Ef5WTRGsFAWpHlHyOySWZeCqPXGC0UtnTH1nAc0UfDthENfA pkIfp4tO6Hilw6t6Qtp9xI5kWs7ZpYrQBvCptSb13nfgitTh267HRyAo3DtD24E3/PrF s1CUHt0WAOnmf23bG/0pG9W8ZaGhabgGeNbsYoNoqKnkUfbitzGIYiCyguBcpcbS9hv9 2i6fpT3vX6y6dJ22N6wxakCjKVBoUAop3YTpkrRGL3oCJk2UY+UBS4zEmJlAf6PLSYjA EkIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8gnzjGXEnICo14bGRV1ztKzSzdozAInlR0wR1z0SthGezvsANpnCtzqW01+O75nzCaDp1
X-Received: by 10.50.110.98 with SMTP id hz2mr7232309igb.47.1401670899057; Sun, 01 Jun 2014 18:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.18.203 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jun 2014 18:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2A4B72CD-EDF3-4D11-AC39-B65892F9173F@nominum.com>
References: <43BB867C-7BCA-45F6-8ADC-A49B34D6C0DC@nominum.com> <5384937A.90409@foobar.org> <m2iooq4oqi.wl%randy@psg.com> <5385762E.5020901@dougbarton.us> <5385AA97.1050207@fud.no> <53864DCB.5070202@gmail.com> <53865EA2.9000502@fud.no> <02dc01cf7c06$cc6a4bc0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <97390E9C-460F-4D08-AFCE-E4A991E2B0E4@cisco.com> <46D22F62-3528-4B9D-9FCF-C9C7466A9ABA@delong.com> <20140531104145.GQ46558@Space.Net> <m1WqqZ4-0000DqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20140531214908.10FEE1719BB4@rock.dv.isc.org> <m1WqrFK-0000BHC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <23125E9D-85A1-49EB-ACE6-DB5EAC67EE02@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr0pvet1oOip-Y2Xi_h2mSZfW1R5HtfiAGbDEns0dY-d2A@mail.gmail.com> <2A4B72CD-EDF3-4D11-AC39-B65892F9173F@nominum.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:01:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2NH4Kca4EvhjN2XnDbt8F2eS56ipxu3npH9yOh1bmQaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0111d16007f85604facff0ec"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/htd36JseBbFoNTLa5cYjv2ZTMDY
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3a@u-1.phicoh.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PI [ULA draft revision #2 Regarding isolated networks]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 01:01:47 -0000

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Jun 1, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> > Because...?
>
> Because any situation where you are multi-homed, if either home fails and
> your software can't try both to see which one is working, there's a good
> chance it will fail to connect.
>

And this problem is specific to IPv6 because...?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email