IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 13 June 2017 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09A3131723 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6JmKPCDU0sl for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8E41316A1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 04:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v5DBYdLG129831 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:34:39 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DA3C203FB7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:34:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1420920149F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:34:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v5DBYcS6009930 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:34:38 +0200
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <91c3c0f4-eb8b-cdf7-b9c9-7d1eecb7fe64@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0_WR_TB+OC0U1Qt2h6WzUp9EGvrqC1ZKW2mwFeBd3bCQ@mail.gmail.com> <4021a559-5b6d-b3fb-19cd-afbe9041e8f2@gmail.com> <34A29D4D-3670-40BC-B62E-85C4EABC55D5@employees.org> <6e03e25e-fd6a-6311-390e-4834281a76f7@si6networks.com> <1B580CBB-B29D-4860-9EC8-BECD1D5E0006@employees.org> <4b2f5200-86a1-7711-e5ff-7436572be467@gmail.com> <E02C4C99-155A-4358-A845-F00F8BB071C1@employees.org> <b3ca5271-21b1-ab33-2dff-82735ebe9128@gmail.com> <235143da452c4ff4aec39a26ba918e7e@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <1489a50a-2616-f9ac-4109-16c595e15f90@gmail.com> <FA3032F9-F44B-45B4-9AFF-01EBC84F1448@employees.org> <b1c5c13d-ef69-ef30-546c-9178a2655caf@si6networks.com> <391c730c-fa75-7596-bb6b-383ea6583131@gmail.com> <f2ac9e0a467b4015a0a78d549c0fbbf0@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <a32c0313eeca44ff97e0c7c8b2daf2b6@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <F0047D8F92074BC181C14E7B91602A70@WeiGengyuPC>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <732df8e5-8f74-3bd9-b1d5-31c4a1670c6b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:34:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F0047D8F92074BC181C14E7B91602A70@WeiGengyuPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ubh33syWeZIfiHA7-jWpBMkKimM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:34:45 -0000


Le 13/06/2017 à 05:38, weigengyu a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The flexibility of IID length will bring some benefits. But, is there
> any compatible issues to concern?
> 
> For example, if two networks are assigned with two length IID in
> office and at home, the host, such as mobile phone, pad or note PC
> must adapt to the different IID lengths.

It should work.

Alex

> 
> Is it practical or available nowadays to have such adaptabilities. Is
> it a required to have a default IID length, eg. /64 for the local
> link? Should the default length be supported?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gengyu WEI Network Technology Center School of Computer Beijing
> University of Posts and Telecommunications -----原始邮件----- From:
> Manfredi, Albert E Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 10:30 AM To: Brian E
> Carpenter Cc: 6man WG Subject: RE:
> draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
> 
> 
> I should add,
> 
> The IID length used by all SLAAC hosts on a link would be the same, 
> because presumably, they all receive the same RAs. With the same RAs,
>  their IIDs would have to come out to be the same length.
> 
> And, most of this change doesn't even apply to RFC 4862. For the most
>  part, it applies to RFC 2464-bis. The main points of RFC 4862 remain
> the same.
> 
> Bert
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative
> Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative
> Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email