IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7248C1A874F for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <MGikKVoA5ji0>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.411
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MGikKVoA5ji0 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com (sabertooth02.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465411A88E1 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1437729759; x=1469265759; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:to:from:subject; bh=TilvZ7DSGmBAwLgBnj3YcLBSXtFr9/qMk6RqMb+bWF4=; b=Cqa+pqpu/gBpT3uPzznVZuU6E7K4Y+4mGmepE0Hc6rkAf4aikUb1IcL2 00KZttNqMI73IcNp8J3+sKlrcIKH5aMDHWbf2qYIlcWz9Y6t+bNGGE8ci P3l65iBFIDcKsOESIuSLfo4iMyMeSVZN1ctRPRGuZtaHVwAPidCAvMzgC w=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,7871"; a="94474205"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Jul 2015 02:22:39 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,537,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="1021863297"
Received: from plus.qualcomm.com ([10.52.255.8]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Jul 2015 02:22:35 -0700
Received: from Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com (ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com [172.30.46.17]) by plus.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id t6O9MYgx022533; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:35 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,537,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="968743893"
X-ojodefuego: yes
Received: from unknown (HELO [130.129.14.251]) ([10.64.225.95]) by Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2015 02:22:32 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240602d1d7b39d8732@[130.129.14.251]>
In-Reply-To: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:22:31 -0700
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>, 93attendees@ietf.org
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/01kvEW2tTwmVesGDBmd9gKK7Hqc>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:22:47 -0000

At 10:31 AM +0200 7/24/15, Jose Saldana wrote:

>  In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short 
> skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
>
>  I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I 
> don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But 
> the IETF should avoid it (IMHO).

I went to dinner with colleagues instead of the B&B event, so I am 
going by reports on this list.  Employing such women shows a profound 
misunderstanding of the IETF culture and what the IETF is and is 
about.  I can't imagine that anyone with whom I've worked in the IETF 
would approve of this.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
A real friend isn't someone you use once and throw away.  A real
friend is someone you can use again and again.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email