Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA411A01F2 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RHwx04bgiIIE for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0C11A0167 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lblf12 with SMTP id f12so19202914lbl.2 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oHbfxP95ClZe93Co1YV4urwnB9E+4k2/tq9lflh0144=; b=RRaQ5qGE0dxgX/hHhI6jfuK/+L2QdejlRnBPFuLOxhWFA4smurOcapGmUybRgzEVmK rouY68JIhr4oEw69yNl90WSMAqxUFFI3tYeKPgo5vHXU+x2weQrpqTf5OBRHxK7JbiDW MqWcinAlZUKRu3BK7ILqQy+y9Sg0GUqQpp4T1sxOIhKiu1Q0ffJc7aygXDNa2WJ0bOPM TdppUqOUMyR06PWBXt0hFDv1g3Xtf5bb0VGMTLxuFyE0eT0rA8BsgvKT6zbZ0qVLWZQi KrZFLicr4V93vY7dICmg7Q5Q7usXSd+z5F7zwjeW3Yhr7HPSEM2e1fnC5n4XpHFQdfAI SZrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcKUe3W0Pgtbu9Ves5K3uugZFmD1NqefK1tuSj0b4RqP/IckHJpbcI0Qz67D7tFfMzEyl8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.41.171 with SMTP id g11mr14698832lbl.123.1437757696824; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.200.102 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <14ec1022c70.2818.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <D1D7C653.A348C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz> <D1D7D92E.25550A%Jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <55B2010D.70607@gmail.com> <D1D7D8E8.BB63C%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <20150724110203.GA24701@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <CABCOCHQhv-15tdaAfRTMd7Lm5qogGtAroa=d7WRa+RthXktXGA@mail.gmail.com> <14ec1022c70.2818.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:08:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHTz2U0+obZ=6WFQqq=S+mdfcMEsz4jgfQ7QpBAzN1DHMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11346d9ccaee56051ba20c25"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/AU8aMY_gfxCGatDerYyViSxpz9w>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>, "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>, 93attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:08:20 -0000

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>  Andy,
>
> You raise a great point. See below.
>
> On July 24, 2015 4:00:51 PM Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Although I agree this incident was inappropriate for an IETF,
>
> I too completely agree.
>
> > I wonder how much is the IETF's own fault.
>
> I personally think this is an important point.  While the ietf  hosts the
> event and expect our norms and values to be followed, we are guests in - at
> least most of us - a foreign country with local laws, customs and norms.
>
> >  If the bits&bytes
> > is advertised to vendors as a trade show, and they are charged money
> > (more than a trade show), then the IETF should not be shocked
> > if a vendor thinks their normal trade show procedures are
> > appropriate for this venue.  The IETF should made sure the
> > contract with the vendor is clear wrt/ the dress code.
> >
>
> And beyond contracts it is also, and only in my personal option, incumbent
> on us as a community to work with the hosts and demonstrators to ensure
> that their behavior is ietf culturally appropriate.
>


yes -- that was my point.
I don't really blame the company for confusing bits & bytes with a trade
show,
since that is what the IETF is selling them.  But in this case they seemed
confused on the trade. (Thought I was at the LA Auto Show at first ;-)



>  Lou
> > ...
>

Andy