Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Imho we have have a significant failure in setting and managing our
expectations for sponsors.

The responsibility for that failure lies with those of us who in
various positions of oversight. and I expect that we will have to
address that.

joel

On 7/24/15 10:47 AM, Rosen, Brian wrote:
> There is a discussion on this over on Facebook.
> 
> I’ll repeat my message on this: I expressed my dismay to the
> secretariat, who were very unhappy about the situation.  The
> company employing these women was associated with our host, cz.nic.
> This company was told by the secretariat, multiple times, that it
> would not be a good idea to have the women at the event.  The 
> secretariat did not feel that they could outright forbid them to.
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/24/15, 10:31 AM, "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in
>> short skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
>> 
>> I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I
>> don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But
>> the IETF should avoid it (IMHO).
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Jose
>> 
>> Sent from my smartphone 
>> _______________________________________________ 93attendees
>> mailing list 93attendees@ietf.org 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
> 
> _______________________________________________ 93attendees mailing
> list 93attendees@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlWx/tsACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrKi0gCfQPSsAaVRK10XehTGA4QN8JFa
QjMAn1tF5wP+xXbkRnQqQILxCUZYKZ3Q
=PDt2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----