IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC6C1ACEF9 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFgcSzQIshBZ for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84701B30FC for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3647; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437756062; x=1438965662; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6zQWnw+TR4p9mPEH3Qv+tuKkHTz4g07jtmsvNR5iRK0=; b=D7b0cXDhzxDRPW3WnlFIHwnBfJQQEIAimr6z0O2i5BMGdDR8F00TUBPb P851zAi5k2Tzx8XH4Sp7ApPBzReFc1i2UIDsxr0aIm/gb2zvXtaU54NA1 cudRCSEYe2TJwRGdAV2dHQFFu77CmK/+LtTP/UNZm3yb7cLhsSacRA6Sa M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BAAwCnabJV/4oNJK1cgkhNgT0Gu0EJh3YCgUY4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEBAwEjVgULAgEIBAETKgICMiUCBA4FDogYCLlLlhIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXi02FBweCaS+BFAEElGMBgjaBV4gumSQmg31vgUeBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,539,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="171947518"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2015 16:41:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6OGf12p014616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:41:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.49]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:41:00 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "Pat (Patricia) Thaler" <pthaler@broadcom.com>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] I was wondering...
Thread-Index: AQHQxetAnheegijcMUmiSmXSCTINBJ3qotwAgAAD8YCAAAJjgIAAD/UAgAAPLYCAABPAAIAASiIAgAAAzwA=
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:41:00 +0000
Message-ID: <7743A092-2034-43AE-80B4-06C2332F148D@cisco.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <D1D7C653.A348C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz> <D1D7D92E.25550A%Jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <55B2010D.70607@gmail.com> <D1D7D8E8.BB63C%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <20150724110203.GA24701@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <CABCOCHQhv-15tdaAfRTMd7Lm5qogGtAroa=d7WRa+RthXktXGA@mail.gmail.com> <EB9B93801780FD4CA165E0FBCB3C3E672B388F1B@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB9B93801780FD4CA165E0FBCB3C3E672B388F1B@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.168.157]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_53104A78-7E9C-4147-B399-9949D651F4BC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/M-GSmXeye-54FYznpk56EC0SMn4>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>, "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:41:20 -0000

> On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:38 PM, Pat (Patricia) Thaler <pthaler@broadcom.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m uncomfortable with implementing a dress code as a way to deal with this. Some of our attendees wear shorts. I’d hate to see staff running around with rulers to decide that shorts or skirts are too short, etc.

I am not asking for a dress code. I merely think that an IETF meeting is not a sales event, and shouldn't be operated as one.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email