Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Fri, 24 July 2015 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D6B1A86FD for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.664
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uoT7e2M-9bCh for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [5.35.241.16]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8F0F1A1A15 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.211] (ip-109-40-153-64.web.vodafone.de [109.40.153.64]) by lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1336E631E1; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:55:47 +0200 (CEST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=3I8W+YSgDbmIf2rve9mPYgrotPOFS3kzU0mZcOk06RTSoPBB+tT2Y5mzdMpuCycrEnO6/R2SCQ4h54q5x7fpsLSlDbSZ9V0WVDpb7+7PvLRldmhkNMnthvo5rHOi2Aj02Tbqghz0rwI+9bBXkS7VzP4/UdC7iYAROIWGoVZIGs4=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type;
Message-ID: <55B219B2.1050302@gondrom.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:55:46 +0200
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jari.arkko@piuha.net, 93attendees@ietf.org
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <000f424e.4c5905ca181337f1@pulsesecure.net> <20150724085231.8E6C91A1ADB@ietfa.amsl.com> <95fa68c205b24ae48081b01f8ced85f7@NXMDA2.org.apnic.net>, <CAA=nHSJJ0x0WC3wp9jeLZu22Gq0z6Arn1aUg6Shv6TfzPnCsMg@mail.gmail.com> <9464F2F1-BAA2-414D-B9C3-C7FEF35C23E2@verisign.com> <052D3E5E-8632-4011-9614-21E610F45A7B@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <052D3E5E-8632-4011-9614-21E610F45A7B@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060100010700090309030400"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/WsZIZzKDTmnGHeE-QDLg7H1nhVA>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:55:53 -0000

Thank you for bringing this to the general list.

I concur with Jari's view.
Yes. The IAOC will investigate what happened in this case and review 
what can be done to prevent it from happening again.

Best regards,

Tobias Gondrom, IAOC Chair



On 24/07/15 11:35, Jari Arkko wrote:
> For what it is worth:
>
> IETF events such as the Bits-n-Bites are professional events.
>
> The practice labeled as “promotional models" is not considered appropriate
> at an IETF event. I apologise for our failure to prevent this from
> happening and for anyone who has been offended.
>
> We are trying to determine what happened in this case, and I have
> asked the IAOC to set up a mechanism to prevent it from happening
> again.
>
> Jari Arkko, IETF Chair
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees