IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

"Soininen, Jonne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C77A1A7022 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ED7x_FE6Ylo for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0F71A023E for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t6O927kX004143 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:02:07 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id t6O926J1032043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:02:07 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC007.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.38) by DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:02:06 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX010.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.10.52]) by DEMUHTC007.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:02:06 +0200
From: "Soininen, Jonne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
To: "ext Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] I was wondering...
Thread-Index: AQHQxes/tN87DI9HK0epH1K8Da6N7J3qLYMAgAA2RQA=
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:02:05 +0000
Message-ID: <D1D7D92E.25550A%Jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <D1D7C653.A348C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
In-Reply-To: <D1D7C653.A348C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.112]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <E35FAA04EEA2D048B877006028A8F3C5@internal.nsn.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1732
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1437728527-000058E2-E57F31FB/0/0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/G00t8cR51uQ4ai-UL1fy1yGd9-4>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:02:12 -0000

Hi,



On 24/07/15 11:47, "93attendees on behalf of ext Rosen, Brian"
<93attendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz> wrote:

>There is a discussion on this over on Facebook.
>
>I¹ll repeat my message on this:
>I expressed my dismay to the secretariat, who were very unhappy about the
>situation.  The company employing these women was associated with our
>host, cz.nic.  This company was told by the secretariat, multiple times,
>that it would not be a good idea to have the women at the event.  The
>secretariat did not feel that they could outright forbid them to.

It seems that this a case where IETF, secretariat or anybody associated to
the IETF has not done anything wrong. The proper concerns have be taken up
with the company doing this before the meeting. So, this is really just
shame on the company itself and should be concerned as very poor judgement
from their part. 

Cheers,

Jonne.

>
>  
>
>On 7/24/15, 10:31 AM, "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short
>>skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
>>
>>I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't
>>like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF
>>should avoid it (IMHO).
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Jose
>>
>>Sent from my smartphone
>>_______________________________________________
>>93attendees mailing list
>>93attendees@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
>
>_______________________________________________
>93attendees mailing list
>93attendees@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email