IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

"Mankin, Allison" <amankin@verisign.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <amankin@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4A31A1A6D for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2h7Eh92Ja1kK for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f97.google.com (mail-oi0-f97.google.com [209.85.218.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836501A023E for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiho132 with SMTP id o132so862072oih.2 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=AfZRAYeSBDQl+IiTHQG9jLNhJ1sSAGFG2U6r5C2shYE=; b=I59q4kwHnPbikn9lYIFheJESI/4Ojz7OpJI/1f1uNtGMFV6R1QNZMT1FHtESjcdkts e4+GiJF/O6jFBBdFUfj0pxPNjpXVPEsZNvPIaVXWnHOI+jy/I7jpx16vwDxEopA8+HqO NkattmQmBNICgqdNa9K3VYlRHmOJx7opXKmoF1W7eVzNugH/Zn6hb+SsFuzsT0oFuY7L nvHyM/8dH5mq6jWpPefl2CEOE/luaZBy0bRO8zi/XfhJErb3JIT7auMe5zYU8P+xlkl6 Q75F1mPAD126CPkp+TDoWPm4Cgaq8xGsxPHTf6Bj9Rhnnd4LMcgDWdHUVqRGTWb29a8l nRpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnImSpyOl8B4U5CweqariKNgG3SPfphYH1wEVAKoixon0t3yxL0K67D0yfpr070md2Qi5XFVPll7v2rOiSd4RT8maGnyA==
X-Received: by 10.140.238.146 with SMTP id j140mr19901763qhc.3.1437728581007; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 17sm2516254qky.3.2015.07.24.02.03.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02 [10.173.152.206]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6O930Fb021415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:03:00 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:02:59 -0400
From: "Mankin, Allison" <amankin@verisign.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] I was wondering...
Thread-Index: AQHQxetBFJSv6UKawkanaDyIiBsYWZ3qk7aA//+/h5Y=
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:02:59 +0000
Message-ID: <A653611A-9D0B-451E-A7E1-FEE120CC74C9@verisign.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>, <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61132A90FBF@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61132A90FBF@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/g486LDlXwfFznJ6K624M1ETeZAA>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:03:03 -0000

Well said 



On Jul 24, 2015, at 10:54, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

>> In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short skirts, etc.
>> was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
>> 
>> I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't like.
>> It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should avoid it
>> (IMHO).
> 
> Thank you for bringing this onto the attendees list. I've been discussing this extensively with other women here (and some men), but honestly didn't feel brave enough to open the conversation on the attendees list.
> 
> I personally felt incredibly insulted and humiliated by seeing this at IETF. It made me question my desire to participate in IETF.
> Barbara
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email