Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

["Howard, Lee" <[e-mail]>]

On 7/24/15, 1:02 PM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:07:44AM -0400,
> Howard, Lee <[e-mail]> wrote
> a message of 57 lines which said:
>
>> However, I would also not want a policy prohibiting engineers from
>> wearing whatever we want. If you want to sponsor Bits-n-Bites and
>> your lead developer likes wearing heels, I have no problem with
>> that. If I want to wear a close-fitting dress to the next
>> Bits-n-Bites, I hope that would be allowed.
>
>In the specific case of the two "booth babes", they both wore exactly
>the same dress. It has a name: this was an uniform. Like you, I
>strongly value the freedom for men and women to dress as they want
>(and I certainly would hate a policy "IETF attendants have to be
>dressed professionnally"), but, here, they were on duty, and not
>exercising any freedom to dress.

Agreed. I was cautioning against reacting with a policy that went
too far.

Lee


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.