IETF Logo Mail Archive

[93attendees] I was wondering...

Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> Fri, 24 July 2015 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B041A019B for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1VO1t6RpQ-pd for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E561A1A11 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.112] (stransky-220.casablanca.cz [217.11.228.220] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t6O8VFoI001856 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:31:15 +0200
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:31:01 +0200
Message-ID: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: 93attendees@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/bXxdA1n5yegLXE5zyaExkB8Xd00>
Subject: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:31:34 -0000

Hi all,

In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.

I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should avoid it (IMHO).

Best regards,

Jose

Sent from my smartphone

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email