Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ggm@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5561A21A4 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfxQMqrxBmsW for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ia-mailgw.apnic.net (ia-mailgw.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dd8:a:851::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5E81A023E for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:received:mime-version:x-received:reply-to:received: in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type: return-path:x-originating-ip; bh=wVUu4RFeQd0BB6a9EpGyR4Es14ixTvygrEwxGSFHKwo=; b=Jp7elAMDx8D7Jr26j0JlSuM4mT8iTx8RbyVezvvLXuJEcWtHBdJB3dJIjpBOxqPU7JzadS7WwaryV 0L63sZDZzFoCQqeJyeToXm1Bf6nLeTwmoRFDgETqAl6Cb2QE7nxO6WHa+WFyR8bawQRXCT86e/C8Cb budWqqIBASRcJ6A4=
Received: from iamda3.org.apnic.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:dd8:9:2::101:249]) by ia-mailgw.apnic.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:03:40 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (203.119.101.249) by iamda3.org.apnic.net (203.119.111.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:03:51 +1000
Received: by lagw2 with SMTP id w2so10249707lag.3 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.186.35 with SMTP id fh3mr12445011lbc.82.1437728627525; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.199.37 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <95fa68c205b24ae48081b01f8ced85f7@NXMDA2.org.apnic.net>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <000f424e.4c5905ca181337f1@pulsesecure.net> <20150724085231.8E6C91A1ADB@ietfa.amsl.com> <95fa68c205b24ae48081b01f8ced85f7@NXMDA2.org.apnic.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:03:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA=nHSJJ0x0WC3wp9jeLZu22Gq0z6Arn1aUg6Shv6TfzPnCsMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
To: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134dcc8208c49051b9b48f3"
X-Originating-IP: [203.119.101.249]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/gLnPe91ushCct3fz87PlBwDCaqg>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ggm@apnic.net
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:03:57 -0000
If it wasn't set as a condition to B&B participants before, I certainly hope the IAOC will do so in future. Sad day. We should be well beyond this. _G On 24 July 2015 at 10:58, Erica Johnson <erica.johnson@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > +1 > > > > Erica Johnson > Director | UNH InterOperability Laboratory > o: 1.603.862.0117 | m: 1.603.421.4802 > http://www.iol.unh.edu > > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Imad Y. Hoballah < > imad.hoballah@tra.gov.lb> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> Imad Y. Hoballah >> TRA Lebanon >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net> >> Date: 24/07/2015 11:50 AM (GMT+02:00) >> To: jsaldana@unizar.es, 93attendees@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... >> >> +1 >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Lisa >> >> >> Lisa Lorenzin >> >> Principal Solutions Architect, Pulse Secure >> >> 919-384-7275 | llorenzin@pulsesecure.net >> <%C2%A0llorenzin@pulsesecure.net> >> >> >> Please pardon brevity - sent from my phone >> >> >> ------ Original message------ >> >> *From: *Jose Saldana >> >> *Date: *Fri, Jul 24, 2015 10:32 >> >> *To: *93attendees@ietf.org; >> >> *Subject:*[93attendees] I was wondering... >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short >> skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful. >> >> I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't >> like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should >> avoid it (IMHO). >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jose >> >> Sent from my smartphone >> _______________________________________________ >> 93attendees mailing list >> 93attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees >> This e-mail and file(s) transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >> Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure to another person is strictly >> prohibited and you are not authorized to copy, distribute or use this >> e-mail or any of its attachment(s) unless with the prior consent of the >> sender. If you are not the intended recipient, or have received the e-mail >> by error, you should not read the contents of this e-mail or any >> attachments, and you should not disclose them to any other person or use >> them in any way, and please delete this e-mail and file(s) if attached) >> from your system and notify the sender immediately at the above telephone >> number or electronic e-mail address. Any views presented in this email are >> solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent that of the >> Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) of Lebanon. Although this >> email is believed to be free from any virus, it is the responsibility of >> the recipient to make sure that it is transmitted virus exempt. In any >> event the TRA has no liability whatsoever for any damage caused by any >> virus/worms that may have been transmitted by this e-mail. >> Telecommunications Regulatory Authority, Lebanon – http://www.tra.gov.lb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 93attendees mailing list >> 93attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees >> >> >
- [93attendees] I was wondering... Jose Saldana
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Rosen, Brian
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Lisa Lorenzin
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Imad Y. Hoballah
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Nalini Elkins
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Erica Johnson
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Soininen, Jonne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... joel jaeggli
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Mankin, Allison
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Natasha Rooney
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... George Michaelson
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Wiley, Glen
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Erik Nordmark
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Jeff Haas
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Black, David
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... FOSSATI, Thomas (Thomas)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... John Dowdell
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... joel jaeggli
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Jari Arkko
- Re: [93attendees] APOLOGY - (was I was wondering.… Ondrej Filip
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Howard, Lee
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Wendy Roome
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... jon.hudson
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Bob Hinden
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Howard, Lee
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Davey(宋林健)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Andy Bierman
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Lou Berger
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Andy Bierman
- Re: [93attendees] APOLOGY - (was I was wondering.… Jane Coffin
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Василий Долматов
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Charlie Perkins
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Barry Leiba
- Re: [93attendees] APOLOGY - (was I was wondering.… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Василий Долматов
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] thanks for the bnb Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Randy Bush
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Dave Crocker
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ladislav Lhotka