IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

"Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz> Fri, 24 July 2015 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B4C1A1B34 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOl8jGZV3srp for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B098A1A1A52 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0078664.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.15.0.59/8.14.7) with SMTP id t6O8j8fd029021; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 04:48:01 -0400
Received: from stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1vu4t6982r-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 04:48:01 -0400
Received: from STNTEXMB13.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.3.249]) by stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 04:47:59 -0400
From: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] I was wondering...
Thread-Index: AQHQxetG92mfUwdMqkmjBV611qvi/p3qs5yA
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:47:58 +0000
Message-ID: <D1D7C653.A348C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [192.168.132.13]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <468F08F12A666B4189030FE0A268B1BB@neustar.biz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151, 1.0.33, 0.0.0000 definitions=2015-07-24_04:2015-07-22,2015-07-24,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/PlDl4-efdFKx9GAd3Erh5QotN00>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:48:03 -0000

There is a discussion on this over on Facebook.

I’ll repeat my message on this:
I expressed my dismay to the secretariat, who were very unhappy about the
situation.  The company employing these women was associated with our
host, cz.nic.  This company was told by the secretariat, multiple times,
that it would not be a good idea to have the women at the event.  The
secretariat did not feel that they could outright forbid them to.

  

On 7/24/15, 10:31 AM, "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short
>skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
>
>I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't
>like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF
>should avoid it (IMHO).
>
>Best regards,
>
>Jose
>
>Sent from my smartphone
>_______________________________________________
>93attendees mailing list
>93attendees@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email