IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

"Davey(宋林健)" <ljsong@biigroup.cn> Fri, 24 July 2015 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ljsong@biigroup.cn>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5311A036F for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.049
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cS8RUYXWzQgp for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbg303.qq.com (smtpbg303.qq.com [184.105.206.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438F41A1A10 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp1t1437742141t408t117
Received: from dhcp-89e2.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [31.133.137.226]) by esmtp4.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:48:53 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000003000F0FxF2000A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: BItkyeoPD2Kxo78TqCPP5nSqMcsl4/tJA/nQxCUYvyRuOhCyET+m51+753SdP JmLZ1fdeD3HqCcfenbTmOLRJe9je6Ecy5EmjKPdfWo88smA4AbV7WMka+miJhm+3CFNGOby x8MgLJn+msMU5GYy0XN/dZQN9njpJ/MOun8nbXcqqvc72RPMMfV0wKNeQSV6B8s5tNcgBR5 OOq4BL1atUdPM2pqt5vexfUbe6+OoRAKHfVipJ56FGj3MDasIkARaj1ZD5CJibEVos5Aq+D cu+A==
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: "\"Davey(宋林健)\"" <ljsong@biigroup.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20150724110203.GA24701@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:48:52 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7B4B7D7D-10FD-4975-9D79-549A96D33EAC@biigroup.cn>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <D1D7C653.A348C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz> <D1D7D92E.25550A%Jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <55B2010D.70607@gmail.com> <D1D7D8E8.BB63C%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <20150724110203.GA24701@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
X-QQ-FName: 211295806B85439591C5C1C3D36C3370
X-QQ-LocalIP: 127.0.0.1
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/g5aF8Gg9xLLItwIZ0GiijlEEbis>
Cc: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:49:11 -0000

> 在 2015年7月24日，13:02，Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> 写道：
> 
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:07:44AM -0400,
> Howard, Lee <lee.howard@twcable.com> wrote 
> a message of 57 lines which said:
> 
>> However, I would also not want a policy prohibiting engineers from
>> wearing whatever we want. If you want to sponsor Bits-n-Bites and
>> your lead developer likes wearing heels, I have no problem with
>> that. If I want to wear a close-fitting dress to the next
>> Bits-n-Bites, I hope that would be allowed.
> 
> In the specific case of the two "booth babes", they both wore exactly
> the same dress. It has a name: this was an uniform. Like you, I
> strongly value the freedom for men and women to dress as they want
> (and I certainly would hate a policy "IETF attendants have to be
> dressed professionnally"), but, here, they were on duty, and not
> exercising any freedom to dress.

Yes. I agree.

> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email