Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

"Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gwiley@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAED1A6FEF for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TG8iKLdk42D9 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f97.google.com (mail-qg0-f97.google.com [209.85.192.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E331A21B4 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgii95 with SMTP id i95so869334qgi.0 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:mime-version; bh=16BEY+hY8Gt/tEQddTp6mmTa2uaDjwuB5xuok1ZKQqY=; b=eychC//HRkkoN6avyBSbbHqTmo3u+aBoiITVJlExAS7UzjxxOu21MT09uOjaom1g67 y+OOIATv4jHHhHcrgHK50bJlC/eoxlCXYpAj4DvBhwgFsFifHMm107dDILZ7hQl6+uFH JJ3O8ozrIqGmZA9lMb85VlEde3ynW/lo57ULT1FiihPYu4zhbMNj/HgKe8cJEiuLAJ4u vPvPJ8HKq6zGhOsBaDlb0atjuK9PHL12TprdAAdEfhLcAgRbuuynSS+4RQMuqzIrSMIM JIkPH5Nxkfj2+TwL6/T5OG/VVpN84aDRkyuFckTPP3yYts9f6M5wdt1/Ba6pG4ZpQdmw okdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkX1ZNHN8BOZmAheOSl+lM/bu9IK3vSFZ09CffK8fSaMNlzTtjvBdCF5BPX9Ji2ombBpXUPh4YuO1ILeax47oxqETQAJA==
X-Received: by 10.140.89.100 with SMTP id u91mr18374199qgd.15.1437728794770; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 93sm2507699qks.4.2015.07.24.02.06.34 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6O96YYc014827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:06:34 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:06:34 -0400
From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
To: "<ggm@apnic.net>" <ggm@apnic.net>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] I was wondering...
Thread-Index: AQHQxetB9zeVrHwuAUSJ1asPEUTtSZ3qkpkAgAAAvwD//8A6bYAAAKnK
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:06:33 +0000
Message-ID: <9464F2F1-BAA2-414D-B9C3-C7FEF35C23E2@verisign.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <000f424e.4c5905ca181337f1@pulsesecure.net> <20150724085231.8E6C91A1ADB@ietfa.amsl.com> <95fa68c205b24ae48081b01f8ced85f7@NXMDA2.org.apnic.net>, <CAA=nHSJJ0x0WC3wp9jeLZu22Gq0z6Arn1aUg6Shv6TfzPnCsMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=nHSJJ0x0WC3wp9jeLZu22Gq0z6Arn1aUg6Shv6TfzPnCsMg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9464F2F1BAA2414DB9C3C7FEF35C23E2verisigncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/U_OUtxEeByXbcenwl4Gt9-li6a8>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:06:38 -0000

+1

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 24, 2015, at 11:04, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net<mailto:ggm@apnic.net>> wrote:

If it wasn't set as a condition to B&B participants before, I certainly hope the IAOC will do so in future.

Sad day. We should be well beyond this.

_G

On 24 July 2015 at 10:58, Erica Johnson <erica.johnson@iol.unh.edu<mailto:erica.johnson@iol.unh.edu>> wrote:
+1



Erica Johnson
Director | UNH InterOperability Laboratory
o: 1.603.862.0117<tel:1.603.862.0117> | m: 1.603.421.4802<tel:1.603.421.4802>
http://www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>




On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Imad Y. Hoballah <imad.hoballah@tra.gov.lb<mailto:imad.hoballah@tra.gov.lb>> wrote:
+1



Imad Y. Hoballah
TRA Lebanon


-------- Original message --------
From: Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net<mailto:llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>>
Date: 24/07/2015 11:50 AM (GMT+02:00)
To: jsaldana@unizar.es<mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es>, 93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...


+1


Regards,

Lisa


Lisa Lorenzin

Principal Solutions Architect, Pulse Secure

919-384-7275<tel:919-384-7275> | llorenzin@pulsesecure.net<mailto:%C2%A0llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>


Please pardon brevity - sent from my phone


------ Original message------

From: Jose Saldana

Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2015 10:32

To: 93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>;

Subject:[93attendees] I was wondering...


Hi all,

In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.

I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should avoid it (IMHO).

Best regards,

Jose

Sent from my smartphone
_______________________________________________
93attendees mailing list
93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
This e-mail and file(s) transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure to another person is strictly prohibited and you are not authorized to copy, distribute or use this e-mail or any of its attachment(s) unless with the prior consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, or have received the e-mail by error, you should not read the contents of this e-mail or any attachments, and you should not disclose them to any other person or use them in any way, and please delete this e-mail and file(s) if attached) from your system and notify the sender immediately at the above telephone number or electronic e-mail address. Any views presented in this email are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent that of the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) of Lebanon. Although this email is believed to be free from any virus, it is the responsibility of the recipient to make sure that it is transmitted virus exempt. In any event the TRA has no liability whatsoever for any damage caused by any virus/worms that may have been transmitted by this e-mail. Telecommunications Regulatory Authority, Lebanon – http://www.tra.gov.lb

_______________________________________________
93attendees mailing list
93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees



_______________________________________________
93attendees mailing list
93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees