Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
"Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:06 UTC
Return-Path: <gwiley@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAED1A6FEF for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TG8iKLdk42D9 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f97.google.com (mail-qg0-f97.google.com [209.85.192.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E331A21B4 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgii95 with SMTP id i95so869334qgi.0 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:mime-version; bh=16BEY+hY8Gt/tEQddTp6mmTa2uaDjwuB5xuok1ZKQqY=; b=eychC//HRkkoN6avyBSbbHqTmo3u+aBoiITVJlExAS7UzjxxOu21MT09uOjaom1g67 y+OOIATv4jHHhHcrgHK50bJlC/eoxlCXYpAj4DvBhwgFsFifHMm107dDILZ7hQl6+uFH JJ3O8ozrIqGmZA9lMb85VlEde3ynW/lo57ULT1FiihPYu4zhbMNj/HgKe8cJEiuLAJ4u vPvPJ8HKq6zGhOsBaDlb0atjuK9PHL12TprdAAdEfhLcAgRbuuynSS+4RQMuqzIrSMIM JIkPH5Nxkfj2+TwL6/T5OG/VVpN84aDRkyuFckTPP3yYts9f6M5wdt1/Ba6pG4ZpQdmw okdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkX1ZNHN8BOZmAheOSl+lM/bu9IK3vSFZ09CffK8fSaMNlzTtjvBdCF5BPX9Ji2ombBpXUPh4YuO1ILeax47oxqETQAJA==
X-Received: by 10.140.89.100 with SMTP id u91mr18374199qgd.15.1437728794770; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com. [72.13.63.41]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 93sm2507699qks.4.2015.07.24.02.06.34 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6O96YYc014827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:06:34 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:06:34 -0400
From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
To: "<ggm@apnic.net>" <ggm@apnic.net>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] I was wondering...
Thread-Index: AQHQxetB9zeVrHwuAUSJ1asPEUTtSZ3qkpkAgAAAvwD//8A6bYAAAKnK
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:06:33 +0000
Message-ID: <9464F2F1-BAA2-414D-B9C3-C7FEF35C23E2@verisign.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <000f424e.4c5905ca181337f1@pulsesecure.net> <20150724085231.8E6C91A1ADB@ietfa.amsl.com> <95fa68c205b24ae48081b01f8ced85f7@NXMDA2.org.apnic.net>, <CAA=nHSJJ0x0WC3wp9jeLZu22Gq0z6Arn1aUg6Shv6TfzPnCsMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=nHSJJ0x0WC3wp9jeLZu22Gq0z6Arn1aUg6Shv6TfzPnCsMg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9464F2F1BAA2414DB9C3C7FEF35C23E2verisigncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/U_OUtxEeByXbcenwl4Gt9-li6a8>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:06:38 -0000
+1 Sent from my iPhone On Jul 24, 2015, at 11:04, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net<mailto:ggm@apnic.net>> wrote: If it wasn't set as a condition to B&B participants before, I certainly hope the IAOC will do so in future. Sad day. We should be well beyond this. _G On 24 July 2015 at 10:58, Erica Johnson <erica.johnson@iol.unh.edu<mailto:erica.johnson@iol.unh.edu>> wrote: +1 Erica Johnson Director | UNH InterOperability Laboratory o: 1.603.862.0117<tel:1.603.862.0117> | m: 1.603.421.4802<tel:1.603.421.4802> http://www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Imad Y. Hoballah <imad.hoballah@tra.gov.lb<mailto:imad.hoballah@tra.gov.lb>> wrote: +1 Imad Y. Hoballah TRA Lebanon -------- Original message -------- From: Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net<mailto:llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>> Date: 24/07/2015 11:50 AM (GMT+02:00) To: jsaldana@unizar.es<mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es>, 93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... +1 Regards, Lisa Lisa Lorenzin Principal Solutions Architect, Pulse Secure 919-384-7275<tel:919-384-7275> | llorenzin@pulsesecure.net<mailto:%C2%A0llorenzin@pulsesecure.net> Please pardon brevity - sent from my phone ------ Original message------ From: Jose Saldana Date: Fri, Jul 24, 2015 10:32 To: 93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>; Subject:[93attendees] I was wondering... Hi all, In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful. I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should avoid it (IMHO). Best regards, Jose Sent from my smartphone _______________________________________________ 93attendees mailing list 93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees This e-mail and file(s) transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure to another person is strictly prohibited and you are not authorized to copy, distribute or use this e-mail or any of its attachment(s) unless with the prior consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, or have received the e-mail by error, you should not read the contents of this e-mail or any attachments, and you should not disclose them to any other person or use them in any way, and please delete this e-mail and file(s) if attached) from your system and notify the sender immediately at the above telephone number or electronic e-mail address. Any views presented in this email are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent that of the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) of Lebanon. Although this email is believed to be free from any virus, it is the responsibility of the recipient to make sure that it is transmitted virus exempt. In any event the TRA has no liability whatsoever for any damage caused by any virus/worms that may have been transmitted by this e-mail. Telecommunications Regulatory Authority, Lebanon – http://www.tra.gov.lb _______________________________________________ 93attendees mailing list 93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees _______________________________________________ 93attendees mailing list 93attendees@ietf.org<mailto:93attendees@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
- [93attendees] I was wondering... Jose Saldana
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Rosen, Brian
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Lisa Lorenzin
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Imad Y. Hoballah
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Nalini Elkins
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Erica Johnson
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Soininen, Jonne (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... joel jaeggli
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Mankin, Allison
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Natasha Rooney
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... George Michaelson
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Wiley, Glen
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Erik Nordmark
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Jeff Haas
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Black, David
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... FOSSATI, Thomas (Thomas)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... John Dowdell
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... joel jaeggli
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Jari Arkko
- Re: [93attendees] APOLOGY - (was I was wondering.… Ondrej Filip
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Howard, Lee
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Wendy Roome
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... jon.hudson
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Bob Hinden
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Howard, Lee
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Davey(宋林健)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Andy Bierman
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Lou Berger
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Andy Bierman
- Re: [93attendees] APOLOGY - (was I was wondering.… Jane Coffin
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Василий Долматов
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Charlie Perkins
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Barry Leiba
- Re: [93attendees] APOLOGY - (was I was wondering.… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Василий Долматов
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] thanks for the bnb Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Randy Bush
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Dave Crocker
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] I was wondering... Ladislav Lhotka