IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08A91A1A03 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nsz_8hBfyNiY for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547171A00D8 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.161.142] (dhcp-a18e.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.161.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t6O97csk022342 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:07:39 -0700
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>, 93attendees@ietf.org
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Message-ID: <55B20059.5030407@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:07:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVYWQYqMvNY1CFoqtkxSy5tKLP8lqj+uVfQSD/Si0LHCRwFkrU/fpG32tLJj46ZqCcePKWtSBiWe8mU6gKK+iUyDBkropzlauw4=
X-Sonic-ID: C;JB9NbuMx5RGwjYwFrKU7pA== M;Aof3buMx5RGwjYwFrKU7pA==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/P6iNlSyEUvJaEKjHSKqHWUGDJc8>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:07:43 -0000

On 7/24/15 10:31 AM, Jose Saldana wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
>
> I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should avoid it (IMHO).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jose
>

+1

    Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email