IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED671A8AD9 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCJgKKu0Zx8X for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8723F1A8A91 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so22068681wib.1 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=twUkSG9zHCJISdk4JiOrrps1BvS65qi7YCw6LrGb/Rk=; b=rnHAyPuPX9R+8HLA7gSTJaE4VPgM0Jtgu0diQ4teg4z9Z4GSGrQCwdhv6KHNCM3DFw vSADF4/rzdJDLNGXRgKCZv+5UHkNxSZdO+vHRH8NNYXY7IDXLPRJfJewUSvST4q/pVkK 62oSJCTyTx4dVIRjKji+5u+uXl+UtB1yZCOjBzwCxz2g59V3N6/D9itmrF6kbS7FPSZL Nzlh4QqD73TqeAyRS4tDxQKP+Ai6zJGsrlbHTE67ohArbjHvwrTw+AzBEwyzt9b6IpmB Duc2vaWFm/mXM102b35877AsLzI4Za3cWm8p2hv62qH8PSxDsYuEX28fb8RynATeQWnf 7L3w==
X-Received: by 10.180.91.107 with SMTP id cd11mr5520009wib.51.1437734383353; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.8.1] ([62.168.35.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i6sm11957036wje.33.2015.07.24.03.39.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D231B94F-4CC3-4A9F-A029-36EB51BB7EDC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:39:39 +0200
Message-Id: <719921FC-A5BA-4911-A9A7-98EBE8FEE403@gmail.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/5rH9Pq4NH5QjJqY9pjYblHrvnLQ>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 93attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:39:46 -0000

> On Jul 24, 2015, at 10:31 AM, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
> 
> I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should avoid it (IMHO).

I think it is completely inappropriate at an IETF meeting.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email