IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7581A874F for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HuqJxSy4jayn for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9F71A87EC for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9092CC5F for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:35:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCatLlR_alYE for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:35:37 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4832CC49 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:35:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9BA54C78-9AB9-4A44-B2D6-FDDCC204956C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <9464F2F1-BAA2-414D-B9C3-C7FEF35C23E2@verisign.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:35:36 +0200
Message-Id: <052D3E5E-8632-4011-9614-21E610F45A7B@piuha.net>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <000f424e.4c5905ca181337f1@pulsesecure.net> <20150724085231.8E6C91A1ADB@ietfa.amsl.com> <95fa68c205b24ae48081b01f8ced85f7@NXMDA2.org.apnic.net>, <CAA=nHSJJ0x0WC3wp9jeLZu22Gq0z6Arn1aUg6Shv6TfzPnCsMg@mail.gmail.com> <9464F2F1-BAA2-414D-B9C3-C7FEF35C23E2@verisign.com>
To: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/pTpXMypCRCpYaQ1U82Xtt2tZi6M>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:35:46 -0000

For what it is worth:

IETF events such as the Bits-n-Bites are professional events.

The practice labeled as “promotional models" is not considered appropriate
at an IETF event. I apologise for our failure to prevent this from
happening and for anyone who has been offended.

We are trying to determine what happened in this case, and I have
asked the IAOC to set up a mechanism to prevent it from happening
again.

Jari Arkko, IETF Chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email