Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 13 September 2019 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F265120073; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TUpRE0IAvHo2; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5198312001E; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1i8nua-0007AH-R8; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:55:04 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:54:59 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, iab@iab.org
cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period
Message-ID: <2335B23E657BB18D88667EAC@PSB>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/16WjAOzAkyHmJN1XJPzHTACznsM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:55:08 -0000

Sarah and everyone else,

It has been pointed out to me off list that I didn't mention the
process Heather is trying to convene to discuss general
directions.   I apologize; it is what happens when I try to cut
a message down to shorten it.

I think that is a great idea.  

But, in the context of my earlier note, what I'm worried about
is the community perception of the credibility of the steering
and decision processes.  In that context, I'd like to see
Heather (or a panel acting as a surrogate for Heather and her
predecessors) actually have the leadership responsibility and
authority for this, not just acting to convene interested people
for a discussion, something that, in principle, any IETF
participant could do.

I hope that is a bit more clear and, again, apologies for the
omission.

   john