Re: tone policing

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Tue, 03 September 2019 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416C8120274 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 08:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Isr6UkEOBWF0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 08:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B33501200FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 08:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trixy.bergandi.net (cpe-76-93-158-174.san.res.rr.com [76.93.158.174]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8-0 #1001) with ESMTP id <0PX900AB6I8XX2@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 10:41:21 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Dans-MacBook-Pro.local ([69.12.173.8]) by trixy.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.7-x01 #1001) with ESMTPSA id <0PX9009CKI8AWK@trixy.bergandi.net> for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net ([69.12.173.8] EXTERNAL) (EHLO Dans-MacBook-Pro.local) with TLS/SSL by trixy.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.18]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:40:59 -0700
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 08:41:20 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Subject: Re: tone policing
In-reply-to: <059707fd-afea-e4b4-fa77-967e38206c52@network-heretics.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <737e066d-4646-7021-3466-6a66f8f0a28e@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=trixy.bergandi.net, send-ip=69.12.173.8)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net [69.12.173.8] (EHLO Dans-MacBook-Pro.local)
References: <F2D6FBAB-7DED-41AE-9560-4D0D13B15107@ericsson.com> <1BF349D9-8ABB-4844-965A-A43964E18A41@fugue.com> <29c10b3d-8f48-8888-68c9-7390b1e4df5d@network-heretics.com> <ae8353f1-adf9-c615-a721-9fba85b40d5c@foobar.org> <059707fd-afea-e4b4-fa77-967e38206c52@network-heretics.com>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [190903a] (trixy.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gxHHM_odFlHEF2B_JoZFKPZLVh4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:41:23 -0000

On 9/3/19 7:04 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 9/3/19 10:00 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
>> Keith Moore wrote on 03/09/2019 14:51:
>>> And maybe you shouldn't be trying to shout down people
>>
>> This is your 16th email on the topic since yesterday morning GMT.
>>
>> Who's shouting at whom?
>
> I'm just sending replies to people arguing for censorship.   What I 
> wonder is, why aren't more people objecting?

   Well I certainly object but you are quite capably handling it. I do think
the SAA role has been abused in order to squelch discussion. I am 
particularly
appalled by the message Masataka Ohta received from a SAA, namely:

 >    We understand that this style of communication was accepted (if
 >    not encouraged) in the past, but it is no longer the expectation
 >    now.

Perhaps I missed it but who decided that which was encouraged in the past is
now forbidden? And given that he states there was no additional guidance in
that diktat this has the potential of becoming Kafkaesque if we don't put a
stop to it.

   Culture arises organically, not top-down. If IETF culture changes it 
won't
be from the leadership deciding among themselves what it will be and then to
use the SAA to impose it.

   regards,

   Dan.