Re: tone policing

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 03 September 2019 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00F5120074 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 19:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iaJyVMIDW_E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 19:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 840FD1200DE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 19:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x832PPqc075269 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Sep 2019 21:25:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1567477527; bh=Eb1Mj5/0Ywb+SgX4idN4Nyvmbzvs++IG+yTPVb60mbo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LOEOAlHfTLpnB7RkZ95iuqdXCMtuq/HoTc0s2bieXpdqnw3djRtG3JtvxujeqejdA 1L8l5nuU32z82z42+SYUTVPp3TdjvT2sYUcVUeaRkzUfrFsts+cS2Hl394DVlwg4UW tNR7rQHemZ+H3eeX9sgtygOM22WtV5gdxXTEvl70=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
Subject: Re: tone policing
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <964a7d97-f146-4d2e-aa3e-d39fc08f6f76@Mikes-IPhone> <20190901195210.GA27269@kduck.mit.edu> <f4a03464-9c9d-9ee5-088a-586e2bb326b1@comcast.net> <4100d3fa-3bba-41dc-3df2-bf2d3dc0f667@network-heretics.com> <6abdd246-6ac0-7369-35b8-e299373eee64@gmail.com> <3a707945-2a88-66a1-f5c0-006fae1c77c6@network-heretics.com> <B21A8972-C958-4468-9C2E-73E1773B1C91@mnot.net> <a76b3022-d94e-32c1-97c5-45cfa347481d@network-heretics.com> <BC82596B-E402-41D4-AD22-474E98F2FE86@mnot.net> <24dff788-b36c-bb3f-6cf0-39ee0ddac688@network-heretics.com> <E3F1AA5E-3D2E-40B0-8A16-44091AA9618D@mnot.net> <a0988541-45d3-198b-bdfb-6c31fe110183@network-heretics.com> <0d492a1b-c373-ccae-2274-3e5984c4caab@gmail.com> <198bf00d-efd4-513e-5d68-91f28d7f08dc@network-heretics.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <dfec9bee-56ea-d560-8e54-3a23f47dc386@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 21:25:19 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <198bf00d-efd4-513e-5d68-91f28d7f08dc@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Lh_GbCEjpY1d0Um2aNN18CZhbxE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 02:25:30 -0000

On 9/2/19 8:55 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
> Rather I think we need to try harder to understand those whose "tone" 
> is harder to deal with, because quite often those people are the ones 
> who have rare and valuable insight. 


There's an increasing recognition within the software development 
industry that extremely smart people who are rough around the edges in 
the way you describe ultimately cause more harm to an organization than 
their contributions help. When you dig into the rationale, a lot of this 
thinking translates directly to standards development. See 
<https://www.google.com/search?q=toxic+rockstar+programmers> for a 
nearly infinite number of articles that go into why these people need -- 
for the sake of the organization -- to either learn to contribute in a 
non-toxic fashion, or be shown the door.

/a