Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW comment period

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 02 September 2019 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242371200E5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 17:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44igpJdPBUcb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73BA01200E0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id u13so9136435lfm.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1xODb5DqgwKQb6+tecdDr0NbJaWQoaL2i5h+wU82KhE=; b=AHPYEJMXm1qtVObor0Mw1UhBvJ5NcZpPdWnYLefj2fgW6YWMDeBBZJc/kDAvnuAgT0 ejnK1zAYkK93To96491tN3et6uQWXkpTbKNph333wFMQqWlAzKzLL/AtiX67lgr43dOa uf7Labpg2amWsKxQV/sFvY+y5ZnuyZH6OgXzcNfUtefxGScA2ZQWr7NkCs9mFCeXZCw2 XLle8qX3WzI4gJi7uBGx6l1XfPw1v/QlLhdIaiZ68NvzONhS5FFfa8p+9NG71Q888YFz YJx0tGba+5IKiWFPjMP9K1KkCTHiX1/LMah5MmrIJ3Gxy5sbbkTUJSsKd2Qb0JL2ft1U wMgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1xODb5DqgwKQb6+tecdDr0NbJaWQoaL2i5h+wU82KhE=; b=pp548kIPcBIRLNCBRf1i8wsrhlUEbRWIyHQ9TyciMLJtn3eAct9/dzDJij8v9pfDPi lINtBNhuHRUl5gip2IVw39VVOFHyit6hE3dBg4j92muz/h9Obd82bdOI2zkSR56MZLZb ogBVbij77DMylUiD+3Msnnh3JqL3stn9b1u3vuu/nchYVGu7lqFRBKi5HlHUgfLA2SfD ZGeGdi2avtWXPs4COBKVnWHwZP5umy7UDMfbzPJtSeC/kFim8qAA5V/VPKqiu8n0mtIU /aYIQGc0juK+fORkPVYpoxvklI5BkD1+vraHcbwkwg+YGIsMBHZBMmzdjoirnLLs5N6+ dXRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVdDQdIlKQr2WUyfKBUg+1vQFFv+dPjwZNoD9nj1mNf+uIF/2G6 5T1QvKOISwPLnT8MnXESmwN+P4EcJ/U7jPxNkLUsSA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4wfLhGF2bvZd3d7135zHrev8YYi/9TuxZOI1YFJJfY1bMObw12CGukHteQEZd1bBXxsJYixkAKvhnTAXySBI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:51a3:: with SMTP id f3mr14913750lfk.94.1567384375707; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <061D2F46-71C3-4260-B203-73B07EB59418@encrypted.net> <5B276430-96A9-44EA-929B-B9C2325AFCA5@encrypted.net> <863c6fa8-2735-b2c6-5542-d5d100485a6e@outer-planes.net> <10843FAF-66D2-483D-96AB-2F993803AAC6@cisco.com> <6FA9D85E1B425914CA994AFD@PSB> <dcda8d0b-3e75-53de-560c-cf6942e61efd@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBPQu4oZ6pGT8cgAFPTQk4nnQm4S9LzVF46dwBCA+kO7Sw@mail.gmail.com> <m21rwzfv17.wl-randy@psg.com> <CABcZeBMJVGbKg4P8R26GqJ19wjn5dLRJdZYhVBMWmzizcgBy4Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2woereezk.wl-randy@psg.com> <CABcZeBP+dFB8K9MBvB2ta4Bnh-jN=-e-_7AFtzQeiuG-WxN_9A@mail.gmail.com> <m2tv9vee2i.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2tv9vee2i.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 17:32:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOBxVvCDBtZcOvS-WYRYGi5LGNLgPqKESBhCyqFG5fCug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW comment period
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f0dc370591871c5a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kQE17SENEUTNpUXelxU83eZtluU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:32:59 -0000

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:28 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> >>> do folk not have delete and delete-thread keys?
> >>>
> >>> Of course, but I don't generally think that imposing the cost of
> >>> thread management on every reader is usually a good tradeoff when we
> >>> have clearly distinct subjects. After all, taken to its conclusion,
> >>> one could argue we don't need separate mailing lists at all.
> >>
> >> or taken to the other conclusion, we could have a whole lot of mailing
> >> lists, most ephemeral if we are lucky.
> >
> >
> > I had thought that was in fact the basic premise of having a pile of WGs
> > each with their own list.
>
> sorry; i did not realize you were proposing to spin up a wg.
>

I'm not proposing that. I'm saying rather that we are already in the state
where we have a large pile of mailing lists (1 per WG), and in addition we
tend to spin them up for new significant work.

ISTM that we're differing on the degree to which this is significant and
long-lasting....

-Ekr


> randy
>