Re: tone policing
lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk Wed, 04 September 2019 12:22 UTC
Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A7A1200F7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pE4C2FWOkQyZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic308-17.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic308-17.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.178.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6AB120091 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 05:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1567599760; bh=bN1ZMGU47/xBL0phjFYEAtm9+X54FwFGqldsNx8gd9Y=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=A/RLOSTY6YlsWXKu8Dzbpy/njjOEBR1/WpmJjEeDG9w2CoA1/N9GPkst7Nic6RdMJnAP6yyqyqLnJkvRTlK78zhzW6b6DubfGF9SlFKyg4ymtQZOYkDpy4acRnHLnxI4sB1EVQknIN2+Bg+mDG0qmpsaXy6KryQMlzjlzF3ea0y9PED3ajSkdqFP8o09Et2GhbqznDBfq38+FsZqYnWp+FdY8zC8ZpfC0Qnx26W/kW5rbFSF+gp6zNRzdaUw7vqWMVxsZvIFSKjdwCg9nkZKnQw1zHVkhfBHo1onN+b1106Zk1/Uj+TVjc52SK9ti8CwP0Npj3aGukNTrTLNS0F2ew==
X-YMail-OSG: d_QZvmYVM1kHX.EWuzPwQgHpXyG7UbIu3QjIy6aCzVpm7wxShJVGzxxxJ3I3VLY M2R2PgwF9PulEF1hvJLczjdl_sq6Rqi1zMyG2X1ZRVS666eD1ikx6sma2acEVkFJCROZczSw7pNv amzefTlnKFUrYNx1uIlt7t4GnzxVlcbM8gsbK9aVFUJj1m8MMiMrl8Yk8TMAk24fXAyY_uvt4ExF C25jvnF_L3rBrgIH64sMki.yykrKn4Uc.CKUZEtTW.0rcGZKZ_MPOH2nyAINuZvlVHvfyRpDMANX bvrjwB9jT0jmV8sg5GQ7J6vgj1Nya0GAj4Yrq2l9_tgvl1XVaTjphLJEJdF6M4iQif3J3xLSCSFG KT6r1kGlMdzCPZels9C1NN6GFtk2AnKpU9pZ438u6_WGnaP5OeTdQJskr7S6TAn5Ejo6ENEXUAwJ aKmBs4uws_88bTEt6_GrdAK5KKgaZcWItMwvn_9XdTNkfZCaVDQanKD948QEui2ftR5BOA.EOvK3 VfE63dm90XYxkMkNDtFOTpB0D40Jraxa5Sjp1rTfvWg7rNfape3cZltWkFjm5G15NFMbuQb6oRjH xkVPJzeJRYqAP8WMFQe6PVbzOaRrpwaVzP8Ob6nRVwQm5cPJgHt61LLe0tSYUc303.G_rl8phP4J UdpfvXHKCe4NErwNG6.xGNeUVZnJrEC6_PIwW.o0fJIl3RrY2GWbP2wijkdkQxNanH9Xwi1Bz4m8 xsf9hJQk53Urepv.aWFtYVHKkWq.EiF9jAS544j.XLtfAVPGK.Qz5IAvuMxrSCn5uRmHy_XtSSMi GFSqetVjrHcPZeyTXnhqFaabels93HPZgKUKU6Uli3cj_BmyW0QMMhgej9Qpn02KovsLFLRNNSiw 5fMI67XmiFla3hYorxSIHaNEsRj0W7Quu2TW43TTfck9XACrJNoxiO2cPR81q_gHUaukFFLGWWjg txodcICw1N97OgTJaiJZz_G08qCGYbmEpQ.W8jPp0ETHlE45BqHNmAhlyPPhVZE.QlRyHuaItNNx 6D5B95R8uyd6GdDj5TtN8uVaQ_XJi1syTgM7pqJO.zAyyz8hJ.0QpKJM6cqQLSL9TXpIjeLgdsLd mLX4EQ17WGA4aFBP2YAn7x0he_kGjFISF0txQEYWuLVJaPLYvsnIb4PpkPjzcsVcKJL5NsKMw9vd bXeHCoDIKlTU.wOfBvoAjxiYqAGqosq1JUzNqNYQU0jR98k9AdzdrcANN0Wa6Kfxuf2I7IUQdcDm I5DydO5BMeOlt7AGzWmqYz7Ufpjh0Olf54f_Grae3kAhIv0Uk4Xm.SNXLktEEDMK_EGooeiR6t1b 5i0paW4jjfWVL7WnGEzaOJTo43SHNnZV0TpE5eg--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:22:40 +0000
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 12:21:41 +0000
From: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1204078133.3594094.1567599701882@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <70713c32-4b3c-e3a8-be77-4b230b5965a4@nostrum.com>
References: <964a7d97-f146-4d2e-aa3e-d39fc08f6f76@Mikes-IPhone> <20190901195210.GA27269@kduck.mit.edu> <f4a03464-9c9d-9ee5-088a-586e2bb326b1@comcast.net> <4100d3fa-3bba-41dc-3df2-bf2d3dc0f667@network-heretics.com> <6abdd246-6ac0-7369-35b8-e299373eee64@gmail.com> <3a707945-2a88-66a1-f5c0-006fae1c77c6@network-heretics.com> <B21A8972-C958-4468-9C2E-73E1773B1C91@mnot.net> <a76b3022-d94e-32c1-97c5-45cfa347481d@network-heretics.com> <BC82596B-E402-41D4-AD22-474E98F2FE86@mnot.net> <24dff788-b36c-bb3f-6cf0-39ee0ddac688@network-heretics.com> <E3F1AA5E-3D2E-40B0-8A16-44091AA9618D@mnot.net> <a0988541-45d3-198b-bdfb-6c31fe110183@network-heretics.com> <0d492a1b-c373-ccae-2274-3e5984c4caab@gmail.com> <198bf00d-efd4-513e-5d68-91f28d7f08dc@network-heretics.com> <1956229885.2347860.1567482603842@mail.yahoo.com> <c1e1cf94-662e-e039-609b-a39a7b031529@nostrum.com> <cbba54fc-708d-1ffb-0d24-4494942c94cb@lounge.org> <70713c32-4b3c-e3a8-be77-4b230b5965a4@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: tone policing
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3594093_503610228.1567599701881"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.14303 YahooMailIosMobile Raven/44290 CFNetwork/811.5.4 Darwin/16.7.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z470SS3fCBjceto9zzgBOaxa4co>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 12:22:45 -0000
Adam, Why would I hope you die? I already know you're going to die. And so do you. That's... usual. It's not ad hominem, it's just pointless. concern about me being silent? That's... unusual. (or just showing impatience.) While passive-aggressively referring to me in the third person and reading my and others' minds? quite something. but if obliquely criticising an authoriitarian role is the only thing that merits attention and yet is now beyond the pale, it's time to leave. L. goodbye, cruel world^W^W woke sealions! On Wednesday, September 4, 2019, 2:09 am, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: On 9/2/19 11:49 PM, Dan Harkins wrote: > Furthermore, your email > is a kind of "tone policing" that has been discussed here. You're > stating that the > speaker should watch how he says what he says because it could be > misinterpreted. This isn't about tone. It's explicitly about what was meant, not how it was said. "I hope you die" is the kind of so-over-the-line ad hominem that it gets used as an *example* of an ad hominem. I was hoping Lloyd could clarify that's not what he meant. His silence is concerning. I mean, I get it. It wasn't meant literally, and it was included because Lloyd thought it sounded witty. But it's still an attack on the volunteers who attempt to keep this list usable. Not what they've done, and not the role they're serving, but their actual persons. And that's the exact kind of thing we had people lining up at the microphone in Montreal to say isn't okay any more. /a
- New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Michael StJohns
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Stephen Farrell
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Matthew A. Miller
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Eliot Lear
- RE: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Adrian Farrel
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period S Moonesamy
- Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW commen… John C Klensin
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Bob Hinden
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Keith Moore
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Adam Roach
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Keith Moore
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Adam Roach
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Bob Hinden
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Adam Roach
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Michael StJohns
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Keith Moore
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Michael
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Adam Roach
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Michael
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Keith Moore
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… John C Klensin
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Keith Moore
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Keith Moore
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Melinda Shore
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Eliot Lear
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Leif Johansson
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period S Moonesamy
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Bob Hinden
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Michael StJohns
- SAA Do's and Don'ts Michael StJohns
- Re: SAA Do's and Don'ts Keith Moore
- Re: SAA Do's and Don'ts Melinda Shore
- tone policing (was: SAA Do's and Don'ts) Keith Moore
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Adam Roach
- Re: SAA Do's and Don'ts John C Klensin
- Re: SAA Do's and Don'ts Masataka Ohta
- Re: tone policing (was: SAA Do's and Don'ts) Mark Nottingham
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Mark Nottingham
- Re: SAA Do's and Don'ts Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Masataka Ohta
- Re: tone policing Mark Nottingham
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Mark Nottingham
- Re: tone policing Rob Sayre
- Re: tone policing Stephen Farrell
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Melinda Shore
- Re: tone policing Masataka Ohta
- Re: tone policing Masataka Ohta
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Adam Roach
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Michael StJohns
- Re: tone policing lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: tone policing Rob Sayre
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Adam Roach
- Re: tone policing Adam Roach
- Re: tone policing Masataka Ohta
- Re: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: tone policing Rob Sayre
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Christer Holmberg
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Paul Wouters
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Nick Hilliard
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Nick Hilliard
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: tone policing Adam Roach
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing ned+ietf
- Re: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: tone policing Randy Bush
- Re: tone policing Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: Sergeant-at-Armss and New proposal/New SOW co… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: tone policing Masataka Ohta
- Re: tone policing Patrik Fältström
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- RE: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Adrian Farrel
- Re: tone policing lloyd.wood
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: tone policing Salz, Rich
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Paul Wouters
- Re: tone policing Salz, Rich
- Re: tone policing Doug Royer
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: tone policing Joel M. Halpern
- Re: tone policing Salz, Rich
- Re: tone policing Salz, Rich
- Re: tone policing Bron Gondwana
- Re: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: tone policing Stephen Farrell
- Re: tone policing Brian E Carpenter
- Re: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: tone policing Bron Gondwana
- Re: tone policing Masataka Ohta
- Re: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Randy Bush
- Re: tone policing Leif Johansson
- Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Paul Wouters
- BIMI: Re: tone policing Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Ted Lemon
- Re: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Stan Kalisch
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Dan Harkins
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Nico Williams
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda Denial Was: tone policing Keith Moore
- Re: tone policing Bron Gondwana
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period John C Klensin
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Michael Richardson
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period John C Klensin
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Ted Lemon
- Re: [IAB] New proposal/New SOW comment period Christian Huitema
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period Leif Johansson
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period John C Klensin
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period (off-topi… S Moonesamy
- Re: New proposal/New SOW comment period Sarah Banks
- Re: [IAB] New proposal/New SOW comment period John C Klensin
- Re: [IAB] New proposal/New SOW comment period Stephen Farrell
- Re: [rfc-i] [IAB] New proposal/New SOW comment pe… Brian E Carpenter
- "community" for the RFC series (was: Re: [rfc-i] … Stephen Farrell
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "community" for the RFC series (was: Re: [rfc… John C Klensin
- Re: [IAB] New proposal/New SOW comment period Christian Huitema
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Stephen Farrell
- The IETF, Standards process, and the impact on th… Michael StJohns
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Nico Williams
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… John C Klensin
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… John C Klensin
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… John C Klensin
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Nico Williams
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Michael StJohns
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Christian Huitema
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Nico Williams
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Keith Moore
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… John C Klensin
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Nico Williams
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Leif Johansson
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Stephen Farrell
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Randy Bush
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Keith Moore
- Re: [rfc-i] "community" for the RFC series Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: "community" for the RFC series John C Klensin
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Stephen Farrell
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Randy Presuhn
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Christian Huitema
- Re: "community" for the RFC series S Moonesamy
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Michael StJohns
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Stephen Farrell
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Stephen Farrell
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The IETF, Standards process, and the impact o… Michael Richardson
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Christian Huitema
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Christian Huitema
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Stephen Farrell
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Keith Moore
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Christian Huitema
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Stephen Farrell
- Re: [IAB] "community" for the RFC series Colin Perkins
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Keith Moore
- Re: "community" for the RFC series Brian E Carpenter