IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: tone policing

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 10 September 2019 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F4312080A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nSx9vdkKw4hM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80DF12000F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id y144so7045133qkb.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=JrL84EnwveEpjNT2Mu1f76H7ImwsJtjmMgfF4Qrv9GM=; b=1Ad6JySzuFFaqmmgidPjSCymYIqLHsnL9lN/ijcmECKuHn82vusQo9LTUzLT4QHg9Y /pKB12gjKcvvw4VWMNgk9EQaYUZvmLIDxptmzIt1wX3O8UqQ90rX/6DhjL1tVh6g/kqp leGuclwq0ALU9q9CRtIH2x6/KqOA8lIkO9kHf88fI7DCP3mHARlLf5tJKFUjvH8ZLznS /wsDoz5s0yoIdZP4NVwWM9USkXOpvGP/FSE4XYZ98vGc0tQ7tgL4eUfBG4tQlwlKIOop VXU3dBPgQFm7TdGha8YoilOS+7mX4IzQ+72ux4UDYwMF0q//zIvYRnR/AdkWvI1Cfsd2 JuoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=JrL84EnwveEpjNT2Mu1f76H7ImwsJtjmMgfF4Qrv9GM=; b=iPTYyoQ8f9AHnPIGm1TSfSSpbQILoVBuBq12NtnxKr/n6+Up9T3zpw/fBSS9IOO02L FX6TMRBKMI0GoRzZdzET8Jr9bu3LzCemdCWo4/BJR97wz7/rAqjazHSlCkHjWxkpKj0P FF9l2y/IztZzI5MJr6OnV2tzK+ZIugh88iQC0aIEK+lZGt2RN09J0jfzILeJah+5LPbX 4uq6MxMgTfbykcS1LS1TJdU6KNCkvWwbTr5nFgHfOb8EgIWSLQlKmJgagtBPrLRmnOlK GscdBwEJTGiCXMt+SbAv/T9mbWksakmgXVIgvRhFcjhUhkRUSquVXXGX3F57CsC9nMn+ ea0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAVBPYqCh8W3ew1CB2NG35CByE5df3/jA/yjqOrQOwplpMg9ub LlFNJl97Y94rSO24FTVjnxf3c8P/If2zaw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHKtmbbBma+45o62DoygPczccDukIv7JWYpMkGlqILtBn8BIJkhg2G2Bc7XR69AdnyOjFttQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4d90:: with SMTP id a138mr26211491qkb.128.1568073948654; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.56] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x33sm5488445qtd.79.2019.09.09.17.05.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: tone policing
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:05:47 -0400
Message-Id: <859377DE-9421-4D5D-9D31-44396F9CF854@fugue.com>
References: <f1543cc4-7dcc-35f4-eea0-428be8ce5597@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <f1543cc4-7dcc-35f4-eea0-428be8ce5597@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A836)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CrVE6GrTaQo_zyoGptjS9Ye1W0E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:05:52 -0000

Strong meaning a lot of effort, not a cursory attempt. There don’t need to be any constraints other than that any idea that is repeated is ignored or used to clarify the summary if there is a reason to do so. And anything that’s a non-falsifiable opinion is noted but not treated in the summary as if it contradicts a testable assertion. 

> On Sep 9, 2019, at 19:56, Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
> How can it be "strong"? By "imposing constraints"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email