IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: tone policing

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 03 September 2019 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7897912013B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 07:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id orAwTMrHb1nw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 07:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2CBA120129 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 07:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id n9so9266522pgc.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=pOKwQm/UyJXiqK4wUwo2KPXIX/Kz4p7OHsz8loNGJJM=; b=HkKQCjEOvuBVqb066u0BWQjC+LOeoWvD6m/Gyvsjmcpfz2xPKj4w1Ac5Ii2clmd1/q X7v6F3vh5xzcOjur+IFo4I1zSK9904hvF11CD7LnVhoYnhgQhzLwje8MTEOpJJXfTWlV J3KAnTrESLWpnHlmUUBfvC6fH5hcRwu7bk367hEpd4F47nd2D+wWL+A4NjIAHahMHL8u dbXUmhAPp6L6/Tia3Zd6nWcb4eDYV91GigOWqCOf1wB2dtwKs/I3PsSffUJyYcMwe3UD Z2k+bzPgts9pnyv2M4WcksSP/Fw+AvFZC1vg+aEIznTmun5ex6xJQqkydwpXmNo0ufph nuBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=pOKwQm/UyJXiqK4wUwo2KPXIX/Kz4p7OHsz8loNGJJM=; b=ekbEs1NpBt9nUHofOTcY2/O9ddjKJlVhptKRVjPH09Qumek60AlWmDW4FHU/ucz4BJ qOaCk9noFq5QUeilZoFSYs+vW4wKRe8uZKl94GUiGaX7SKyMmjaQp/amGaMB0nAUv/hm vd6JK7a2A44O6OT7lCk4vpGTgpmRlLPf1I/8oEqrf/yOqCGwS1LpAwSpmuSztreGmNun eYcDRFoScd5JwShm3tUgXd8a6phxnny63mxpVMGUOdrEgzpToWSQEkEbsJqP/pQczi/p n53/9Ls5FgDvqXPgUFeO0bRg7KkhJGza6JgLoccS51t85nLN2criq4GjWAzCtpt2VfZ/ KMEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVe7biz/PYXS447h9W/FnWjFRMXpxBS3ls05uORP9AVCKuRsDPx amIUbObID3AHvRCHKUSZ2RxcQNWkDFU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6hkkSGvd/VXp33pyXP+/YQxTb++xTWrcymzVlkNDlv05+bdwuB2q4iC9wSuIWgxAk9EDMvA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:20a:: with SMTP id 10mr30165844pgc.226.1567521227133; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.44.23.49] ([209.133.79.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm15555172pji.7.2019.09.03.07.33.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <381923E6-597B-4208-A959-0E19BA405B49@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8219A649-1C38-45EB-A21A-01BFFE017A37"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3578.1\))
Subject: Re: tone policing
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 10:23:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <059707fd-afea-e4b4-fa77-967e38206c52@network-heretics.com>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
References: <F2D6FBAB-7DED-41AE-9560-4D0D13B15107@ericsson.com> <1BF349D9-8ABB-4844-965A-A43964E18A41@fugue.com> <29c10b3d-8f48-8888-68c9-7390b1e4df5d@network-heretics.com> <ae8353f1-adf9-c615-a721-9fba85b40d5c@foobar.org> <059707fd-afea-e4b4-fa77-967e38206c52@network-heretics.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3578.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BNg67FD7PKcDQvBSxAf64EYtudQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:33:51 -0000

On Sep 3, 2019, at 10:04 AM, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> I'm just sending replies to people arguing for censorship.   What I wonder is, why aren't more people objecting?

I suspect the reason is that I am not the only one who sees excessively frequent posting of the same message as a form of censorship.

Rather than responding again, perhaps you should listen for a while?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email