Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 04 August 2020 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84D23A10F5 for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jo6vlGJxOXkD for <108attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AC373A1117 for <108attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.101] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BLlXS5pcmzyfx; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:42:48 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <3707B776-1406-4471-AF86-5664887B37AC@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:42:47 +0200
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 618262966.861815-2b86ccd4d0a3173682d43e4c4de7f4cc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A77E8637-93E8-4B0A-94A8-364D010C3089@tzi.org>
References: <DF9553CF-3B73-43C3-9BCF-5160A1949EC7@gmail.com> <3b9cc8e5-a9f2-cc44-8fc5-6b7649e43343@cs.tcd.ie> <392F9FEA-BA4A-4E57-B80D-D5B288B9887A@jisc.ac.uk> <f86a44a9-1f0e-9619-1a01-d2f9c98a756a@huitema.net> <20200802025924.GH1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3C71AFFA-E6D5-446C-B20A-C35B1EB8FFDF@nostrum.com> <m2eeoog2fr.wl-randy@psg.com> <BY5PR11MB4337767597051839FE069836C14D0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <m2wo2fehuu.wl-randy@psg.com> <LO2P123MB21738E9CA388ED45F25072B9E64A0@LO2P123MB2173.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <fb7bd232-e946-a4cc-bc91-ca82fa582134@network-heretics.com> <a55d7ee7-95b4-5114-efc5-0155ed21aa72@joelhalpern.com> <4D72146D-47D4-441C-9C78-32CC20A8AC1C@fugue.com> <3EBAC01F-AB18-4118-9DA4-507B6DDA1C77@tzi.org> <3707B776-1406-4471-AF86-5664887B37AC@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/VVxpSB6NjwPmvj2FJQ0Vcp1cHas>
Subject: Re: [108attendees] Successful IETF 108
X-BeenThere: 108attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 108 attendees <108attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/108attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:108attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/108attendees>, <mailto:108attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:43:02 -0000


> On 2020-08-04, at 19:08, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 12:56 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> Can you explain how meetecho does not support removing microphone access?
> 
> Meetecho is clunky and unreliable. It was hard to even get to speak. The UX was terrible.

I wrote up some 20 annoyances about meetecho over in tools-discuss, so I think I know what you mean.

> Yes, you can cut the mic, but if you do, you’ve cut it. In zoom, I can mute someone who’s making noise when they shouldn’t be,

(Which doesn’t happen a lot in meetecho because it appropriately has a more explicit concept of floor control.)

> I can see who’s making noise,

(Among those 20 annoyances, and picked up by the meetecho folks as a priority request.)

> I can un-mute them when they want to talk and can’t figure out the mute button,

(That might be a controversial feature.)

> and I can see peoples’ faces to know that they want to talk when they are a bit shy. 

Adding a gallery view of the attendance might be a nice feature request.

So I agree Zoom may be more appropriate for your meditation classes.
For teaching, I like BigBlueButton (and so do other SDOs for their meetings, I hear).
With a few features stolen from that, meetecho could be quite useful.

Grüße, Carsten