Re: Too many tools, was Things that used to be clear

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 13 July 2019 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1F912006A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=iT5a4xTj; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=bT857Xfl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9egwFMQjkpoT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C95312000E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 39290 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2019 01:46:53 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=9977.5d29380d.k1907; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=hKUhYJ4JaatH+Sjsq0oAyfzA1roacUke7zt+sca0Kus=; b=iT5a4xTjLrXtZq/bzA1VX4zGjZxhukUX6w1fetyXQ1s3Um64ujx4unvmPxOSZdfEX8F06DD4fB++/o+9GGpakZeWTtAwK/DUm/4J7t8K+M0JzZwDhZ0F7xHbqdkxhmQgBq2Fg31xrt6+lIR5AW12gxcDTZmZe2tk0FduMCHuK0j4tqmEEtaK0MTeafeCGIM/XFm6/w3HSEsqXWyihUZSwQwP8kBMRpXwO7P+oUBFK2GIKj8T1BabRCdUxwqJQzKB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=9977.5d29380d.k1907; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=hKUhYJ4JaatH+Sjsq0oAyfzA1roacUke7zt+sca0Kus=; b=bT857Xfl/EiD5xmDBklZjgA7wDC4ZP07hJwMKmy7Y0Qz0iWLEzR2HQwkcv6rx+WWZY7tHPbJsV4yqXroCfq1ArSuwqzfwwg6/giWLTSpk8lGC5epfx5Hz222+wooB16eqlwO/zzq+JIcXsgnrkeYX4sFt+tQNwbxTElUYoubUf6bQ4TXEDiCqeXP80wklrePNTPldtQjK6+ZuKYBYe7Py2XOlGBzWQd9W6QBRn7ur4BIYdpHejZKtBigjLbTWx3j
Received: from ary.local ([71.59.64.39]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 13 Jul 2019 01:46:53 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id B9DE64A57BC; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:46:52 -0400
Message-Id: <20190713014652.B9DE64A57BC@ary.local>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Too many tools, was Things that used to be clear
In-Reply-To: <20190710190507.GI3215@localhost>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-JUPbiV23t7ERfKqFueAaPYayIw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 01:47:00 -0000

In article <20190710190507.GI3215@localhost> you write:
>Yeah, it does seem lik the XML hate is mostly just that, but that our
>use of XML is not really a blocker.  But these are feelings we're
>talking about -- all subjective.

I think the practical difference is between a toolset that is unique
to the IETF and one that is more widely used.

It is utterly unclear to me whether better bridge tools would help.  I
am pretty sure that with enough effort I could write a two-way
converter between xml2rfc and a Microsoft Word file with suitable
stylesheets and macros.  (It'd be a lot harder than what Joe has
done.)  So you could edit stuff in Word, and revise by importing
xml2rfc into Word and then exporting when you're done.  But would
anyone use it?

R's,
John