Re: On XML and $EDITORs (Re: Things that used to be clear (was ...)) "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 11 July 2019 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD69120172 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35d5xsRAk4gF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from azure.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (azure.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49F812003E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CFE8C29B0; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:07:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-35-167.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.35.167]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E25788C292B; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:07:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.3); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:07:45 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Interest-Ruddy: 697087314034ef9a_1562864865248_1314291519
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1562864865248:3531665442
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1562864865248
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640927F517; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=at2usSQ8HWyvm4SozHFP3RE3hwQ=; b=bgOw69yS99/ vMowvAe1z9QgxL1ST7AEnZ5A0Y3VPVTDM4lLUIHSs/42JfQVsuOMQxpl9xDXabCa 0okws8Xg6tw3bhQ38ydRlXTy/3CfP0DvyRb44gG6Ry9+322jG/r4ird/pXgJhnKz 3ELOU25p/xlsX/zZIKFw1UJR/whkaBTc=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C9F97F512; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:07:39 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a25
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: On XML and $EDITORs (Re: Things that used to be clear (was ...)) "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)
Message-ID: <20190711170737.GJ3215@localhost>
References: <CABcZeBOH9LH8Jrz-A5eu9arqUb+bx8xs_eKWi0pyoh7a3qpOPA@mail.gmail.com> <20190708223350.GO3508@localhost> <af3b25d6-af16-a96a-c149-61d01afb4d01@network-heretics.com> <20190708233438.GP3508@localhost> <ea0b9894-ae9d-55a9-a082-af7aac5be66a@huitema.net> <20190710045202.GA3215@localhost> <20190710064451.GB3215@localhost> <06EF2608-038E-400F-86BA-34F57630B53F@fugue.com> <20190710163130.GC3215@localhost> <5B3F1D8E-9426-4040-AECF-327AF689D1ED@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5B3F1D8E-9426-4040-AECF-327AF689D1ED@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgeekgdduudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjggfsehtkeertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecukfhppedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7GlMgxMj4Nc46lgGrcphCQAE670>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:07:49 -0000

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:33:27AM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Using a more human-centric authoring language (markdown, LaTex if that
> rocks your boat) and then translating to XML does introduce the
> occasional error condition where you actually have to look at the XML
> [...]

Just to clarify: TeX very much does not please me, except for the fact
that there are good BUI collaborative editors for it.  My preference is
very much for XML, but with a UI that hides it as well as LyX hides TeX
from the user.

> On the comments about stability:  For a decade, RFCXMLv2 has had the
> advantage that it was relatively stable (defined by a single
> implementation that for most of that period wasn’t hacked much).  That
> advantage is not available for RFCXMLv3.  Authoring formats such as
> markdown might be instrumental in bridging the period of instability.

v3 will have that advantage in a few years :)

Nico
--