IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: is there a specific proposal for living ops docs?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 20 July 2019 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268591201C6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 11:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjSHb_wM-NEt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 11:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B5A120150 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 11:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1hotqg-0005am-Do; Sat, 20 Jul 2019 18:12:47 +0000
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 14:12:40 -0400
Message-ID: <m2muh8valj.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: is there a specific proposal for living ops docs?
In-Reply-To: <CACWOCC8g_YXT9OU6NxuhFGkxuejxux_ykoKfA7i8cmZ73nWjeg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F2D5DCCF-4051-444B-9522-9E11F9F93005@fugue.com> <869599E9-7571-4677-AB9A-961027549C54@network-heretics.com> <144ff436-a7a2-22f7-7b06-4d0b3bcfefac@joelhalpern.com> <20190719041456.GL33367@vurt.meerval.net> <254fc5f6-3576-a62f-b84f-a7c5d29b0055@joelhalpern.com> <a1561aa7-5f41-0e2a-1892-cfb587196ac0@gmail.com> <C3D53639-C2C0-42CE-9708-99294091E012@puck.nether.net> <a17a8648-14c8-1889-4ee3-86996ff6281e@gmail.com> <3B0C189A-D56B-430F-82FF-19DE0DC788DE@puck.nether.net> <BA80E73F53C26B9191294131@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <20190719190534.GG38674@shrubbery.net> <4f43fac6-ed7f-08ca-d5da-1e84b0a7b12b@network-heretics.com> <3a678b4a-1c9e-8a2a-ea02-ac32a07f3711@gmail.com> <CACWOCC8g_YXT9OU6NxuhFGkxuejxux_ykoKfA7i8cmZ73nWjeg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/21-uxpGqw-zZnGx76F2cGdi2MVw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 18:12:51 -0000

>> That's exactly why I asked about RIPE's solution. Before proposing
>> a solution, don't we want to study one that apparently works?
> Works by what metric?

worked for us in publishing an op doc which was eventually followed by
an rfc

> IETF has take some responsibility for after-care here.

for ripe's doc repo?

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email