IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Igor Gashinsky <igor@gashinsky.net> Thu, 05 November 2015 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <igor@gashinsky.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B40D1B3D52 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:24:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSleMuoCeZsM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from moonbase.nullrouteit.net (moonbase.nullrouteit.net [216.254.64.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEC5E1B2DC2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 2222 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Nov 2015 09:47:34 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Nov 2015 09:47:34 -0000
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 04:47:34 -0500
From: Igor Gashinsky <igor@gashinsky.net>
X-X-Sender: igor@moonbase.nullrouteit.net
To: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2614A6A.CA099%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net>
References: <D25D5920.C914E%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <5637FDD0.70300@jvknet.com> <D25E32F1.C9507%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr1VvzkSmJo3hu6t_3CUguLN_UkNZjRUqvU_ygPBTyb+8g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319739@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr3g-ZV+MkbtDrusbtYaZ_wmCxDG9XbT25Ldma4koGpV6A@mail.gmail.com> <D25E7DDF.C9709%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr3Vsn7Ny_xSCr_=sVCHyU+=ZrRh2iQDUPx-5FWdHajv2w@mail.gmail.com> <D2614A6A.CA099%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="===============7226308357901497542=="
Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050445010.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/2bBfb1L44ni_rH7IXP0G4tmUMN4>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 23:24:51 -0000

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Howard, Lee wrote:

:: On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Howard, Lee <lee.howard@twcable.com<mailto:lee.howard@twcable.com>> wrote:
:: And so on. It seems pretty clear. Is this language insufficiently strong for you? What words would you use instead?
:: 
:: I would prefer if we used phrasing of the form "<xxx> is considered harmful" or "<xxx> is not recommended".
:: 
:: You deleted a lot of context, including the text:
:: 
:: "(NPT66) is not recommended by the IETF."
:: 
:: Can we consider your concern addressed?

That makes it sound like IETF is not "endorsing" NPT66, as opposed to 
actively recommending that people don't use it. I'm with Lorenzo here -  
I would prefer very strong language in the form of "deployment of NPT66 is 
concidered harmful" or "we strongly recommend against the use of NPT66".

Thanks!
-igor

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email