IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] PI heresy [draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 12 November 2015 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385721B3345 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:53:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H5FENOd9OqTu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B5DB1B3347 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so74219786pac.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:53:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ItawGUV6yJrKP3nFcvPUCaeH2xjGTJCnEy00iCmUgQ=; b=B5DcoDKRRtvGqfwYm1HA0nwPWCutJ+lPVqXDW3Kz7/ceZOtUbOqtUeuzcZXUmoRHkr Sht3lqoEBAHXJoqXBgz+FE1cUfkie/ZicV9Sh2enT9ZOMAkq/KhqclFKYJUKoAp99eT/ 1ZsZLh76Eb0OAI7a2dEcrPpbIiOSEdgXOQIWMNu9NdR7X7n24OG5KaDQayK9lkIu8ER8 /4NvSK1o3RttxzRS5SVEfyyb5jTbfDmnEbrg5+8g6lDETcetOSbA4yN5K97/zKzYvR5T vuYXFG4V5vBxx8K5URa1JqLCFNyi0Rfs4lWwT0VCnpZycr05YMZA/GybxuEu/NTeXuJO m/JQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.221.230 with SMTP id qh6mr25769418pbc.32.1447358017877; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:58dd:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:58dd:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cs5sm16236639pbc.15.2015.11.12.11.53.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:53:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, sthaug@nethelp.no
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net> <20151106.063106.74659839.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAO42Z2x3O8A1XKqN3PTcvM=xpF8W_WNSL1rVhHQ4ZY5HbVG=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151106.081425.74651560.sthaug@nethelp.no> <6ED54502-C5D1-4D09-877C-FE283E3EF142@delong.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <5644EE46.7000805@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:53:42 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6ED54502-C5D1-4D09-877C-FE283E3EF142@delong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/gVUd7hxEiq2Byl_XI-uyhnUc8FY>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] PI heresy [draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:53:39 -0000

Please let's not pretend we're discussing the ULA draft any more.

On 13/11/2015 07:32, Owen DeLong wrote:

...
> How is a /48 PI hard to acquire? Where?

As others have implied, that isn't the point. The point (and I expect
we had this argument on the RRG list some years ago) is that we can't
put 10,000,000 /48 entries into BGP. So if we go around encouraging
all small enterprises to get a PI prefix we are all doomed.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email