IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 09 November 2015 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96961B4E2D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 18:41:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B9OyipoR69V6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 18:41:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B951B4E22 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 18:41:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykek133 with SMTP id k133so244229175yke.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 18:41:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=V8P42upBK5nj9uwCqhZhqciT12XvVRIa6ypCGJS+lo4=; b=icmkFtdgt++cCWsI6/TZjsBsakHMOyq+XcHpkk06o1AIGwCC/++F8Cv/CRHIgTytNA 1GoKrsLR6E1qawuFkr6wSaze/Z3/rKXwmsP6RQUMyEjCSAlRc6lqgwiycGPGtOEgtoTl +Sfxqv8/+CoinY7uCq5qzWgL8HD3KUZjKKXX2UYFJV7iiLFVMcIURcaTdxUPoh+4DuKl RYREtYcq4psupc+COeBn9Vs+izaUByy80Zv5iNbJHjHt8RJ/X/H1ZFL3Kl77MHKpRpnU /AHpWahJkR0ClbiVU3aXjKHjsj2NGrJoWtfbNBxvwMHQoipgyyZTfEOWh8uaODsFCED7 H1JA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=V8P42upBK5nj9uwCqhZhqciT12XvVRIa6ypCGJS+lo4=; b=gKBSTIjk4ZjFv3SSJ5Zg7mkgfZFqlwN0zMc1CmPdvAEsyXiOtUCeLxzQmxoakiTQo5 zahag477PCdtHNdk2NY8mesj8mvgeIC6gTNzd37uRh4fEjWiQppXdk7tKKSPmWBMNVpj xkMpc5V9ghXaAqEFf1yQgicoLiuQ2R0j/DiY1ytrv5kK1j6ETdM5Xq7w1yprO6UgMBYj Xzofh1qVqb6f0CtEhR2uTb8XNDGcw7hIDKl4hab0LwjRSY0xhDiE+1L510GS+GU5stDT mvMwqxdmKIYTDpIDm7vPRu7CjJUdtbUwvnmJuNhxEKkSUs2nrUsKBHlzzGBsca9uzBhT KCqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmukY+ahOopaQIS/G7CG1P657Z0tXGJx89E29fYQSQ+cBkUxaMGisuTMX1IhwMLh397b+SB
X-Received: by 10.129.83.87 with SMTP id h84mr24010860ywb.156.1447036863109; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 18:41:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.87.197 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 18:40:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAG6TeAv9DPYUCsNG_vHCTOpwwJ8KdhjWeGE=-s6dEuMgaVHf1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D25D5920.C914E%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <5637FDD0.70300@jvknet.com> <D25E32F1.C9507%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr1VvzkSmJo3hu6t_3CUguLN_UkNZjRUqvU_ygPBTyb+8g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319739@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr3g-ZV+MkbtDrusbtYaZ_wmCxDG9XbT25Ldma4koGpV6A@mail.gmail.com> <D25E7DDF.C9709%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr3Vsn7Ny_xSCr_=sVCHyU+=ZrRh2iQDUPx-5FWdHajv2w@mail.gmail.com> <D2614A6A.CA099%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <563B9D1E.4030606@umn.edu> <D261FE8E.CA1FB%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr3jip0NBkDxg=MvgZXg0LMS+PtREDw2jSRx0xJLqHwhGQ@mail.gmail.com> <563C7C01.6010703@foobar.org> <CAKD1Yr1rKjkDhhuD9L=R_MJ+ofOAZ2Nt+5mszZKQxCh-kH4vqw@mail.gmail.com> <563FA84C.7030601@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0F888Aw0opSigtC8HV6esUrE1JECKQ4gT737s+43ayfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6TeAs8ie=c0F8RMioBpemCw949Bf9c7ZTNvqgaZP=10rmNcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1EqbiGJ8EZo8E909zujUt49skcz1SNe8stEWfHnbUsTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6TeAsHMTyhbRrOenb1kA9XEDdOCBBbuN3ZGF3LJ=8ToyGtiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3RUc9FEw7VyJ=ENH_sJY85m1BESo77v_maShPvCkj6rA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6TeAv9DPYUCsNG_vHCTOpwwJ8KdhjWeGE=-s6dEuMgaVHf1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:40:43 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2VXVFareTk-J_+pcr_UW9Do-zf_uYcyjNW-MTPts6hRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d8dae346e40052412868f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/O1agr2-K4OIb75mPQQPFxMcviY8>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 02:41:05 -0000

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
wrote:

> FTP PORT does not work in the presence of an ipv6 diode firewall, either.
> And layer 3 addrs in layer 7 protocols is not clean design. Period.
>
You're saying that it's a cleaner design to require that any application
that needs to do peer-to-peer connectivity or receive incoming connections
must first talk to a third party to ensure it works? Sorry, but I don't
think that makes sense.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email