Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 05 November 2015 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4781B3526 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:31:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1djzQCyvlX0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EDC61B35B1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so69774413pab.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:31:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QvRB17ingwp5xH36gJSwoFkglI1MwtDgWckbSb+W2YE=; b=aXuxs/vvHiNIV64IE38dXaRZSz+grwEmBY/CEkbWFkAUruVhDCmt8zgd3mCgcB5Fsf UGjBz9VYOjUXFXOtprNKtJAEo0zAEEjSwr0vLFht2cyu+yHdNucbKKyIoQMYXjgW9fIl 2YRIm7BuxoQQeHGpo4ouoFC/oD2ENxBOcVxAA+bQrq1rPQKGIsj5niEQt+2QLZDEeMQb D/30EGRA4GdM0j1I2+STnANLpQtxvyV2AarfxWlud7JQm8As3lF73dtKuwJjl8mYxsGz KG6nwAi9Cd9hD7OqnyTfwt2PPWrLIwrQBctVJye/3NkBbmV9Mi4zppPzQ0RN+AeqnyQy nT+g==
X-Received: by 10.68.235.3 with SMTP id ui3mr5853158pbc.168.1446687075169; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4700:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4700:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id so4sm4339953pbc.72.2015.11.04.17.31.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:31:13 -0800 (PST)
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <20151103204237.GJ70452@Space.Net> <CAO42Z2xen4gCfkJphZYKfjff5ZsEn_jOf5V16OtYOYNw2VKVAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3Qn48eQ1Q4VovCsr_S2+RADRZKzi9qBDoh8G2w6Be+=g@mail.gmail.com> <20151104024731.0DCDE3BC3CBF@rock.dv.isc.org> <D25FB58B.C9B04%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <20151104104208.GL70452@Space.Net> <0EE48C9B-801D-4670-8D02-248789E2F411@umn.edu> <50027DBA-C4C2-4679-8D1C-2992BE7C3B75@delong.com> <20151104170711.GV70452@Space.Net> <ADA388DF-1E4D-43E4-B2EC-7D3E1B93FCD0@delong.com> <20151104195254.GW70452@Space.Net> <CAO42Z2wq4qtUuVLMF2hLkJH268Aij8L=5uX+vkRKbbZ-reZtiw@mail.gmail.com> <563AAC9A.6050304@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <563AB166.3060109@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:31:18 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <563AAC9A.6050304@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ylMuefLrBsbyCgh0Dyu_QZ2siSI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:31:22 -0000

On 05/11/2015 14:10, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:

...
> Which makes think the RFC 2993's section on IPv6 may need update given that now IPv6 NATs do exist, that 6to4 is deprecated,
> that ULAs substituted site-locals, etc.

I can testify that 6to4 had not been invented when RFC 2993 was written,
so its deprecation is hardly relevant.

   Brian