IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sat, 14 November 2015 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677171B3977 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:52:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQtn2qo4pT12 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:52:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 611B41B3972 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:52:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8028DA2; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 06:52:08 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1447480328; bh=QeObwpavW42d3gd7Q4BNM+nBgRlYR5nk6kWKe9/mGFk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aU7DDpQDopPtoZ+GEKjgCXk0IQN0untuCWAXoeVXI3FjyA6xeXqKwDUJ3HvV4RVXl QFTad29RtFYjaL3qVywAP84Hk1C0z+Ki/nJOiaRVuEdSKH4+SKudK2fxAqozZuoFzP r7JoVc1+9w3UkyxhhQfnYcSVSbPrUorQq3huoFzM=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77657A1; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 06:52:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 06:52:08 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <5646589B.7060703@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511140651020.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net> <20151106.063106.74659839.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAO42Z2x3O8A1XKqN3PTcvM=xpF8W_WNSL1rVhHQ4ZY5HbVG=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151106.081425.74651560.sthaug@nethelp.no> <6ED54502-C5D1-4D09-877C-FE283E3EF142@delong.com> <20151112184613.GZ89490@Space.Net> <03C04D1B-86D1-4A5A-A8D3-7508CEC80DE9@delong.com> <20151112194327.GA89490@Space.Net> <95BC3D07-EF27-45A9-A1E0-12F9B43061C7@delong.com> <20151112214819.4EDE63C98D83@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr1jA_PKcjc7tiC9VhQ9yFM=SRzF6fc+fUzk89Jtb4Bvww@mail.gmail.com> <CAKr6gn1uhQhHHQcMj1VyS5+euqEiAQMwtoaF_vsnZQWzqF=MJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511131342540.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0723DCF1-DE0F-4BBB-9673-17686EB823CD@psc.edu> <5645E9D7.4070009@foobar.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511131448520.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5646589B.7060703@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/nWwqmyVMPJVHQykX6PFjEzfs-e0>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 05:52:14 -0000

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> On 13/11/2015 13:50, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> If the Internet will have 10x the number of routes it has today in the
>> not-so-distant-future, there is a considerable risk that most smaller
>> players won't be able to afford to have a full view.
>
> the dfz is growing linearly at ~50k prefixes/year.  On this basis, 10x the
> number of prefixes is a very long way away.

And you think this is going to continue in the future if we say "PI is the 
preferred way to multihome and please RIRs, make it as easy as possible 
for people to do this" ?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email